From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755820Ab0JHIQU (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:16:20 -0400 Received: from mx2.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.151.9]:39400 "EHLO mx2.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755640Ab0JHIQS (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Oct 2010 04:16:18 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 10:16:04 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Yinghai Lu , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Thomas Gleixner , LKML Subject: Re: Section mismatches in memblock Message-ID: <20101008081604.GB13754@elte.hu> References: <4CABAAB4.3090707@zytor.com> <4CABB4FD.2090304@kernel.org> <4CABDF3A.2020501@zytor.com> <4CABE739.8050001@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CABE739.8050001@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 10/05/2010 07:30 PM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > > > > Wrong functions! Furhtermore, at least the tip tree definitely does not > > have __init_memblock here: > > > > Nevermind. I had missed that Ingo had put stuff into core/memblock on > top of x86/memblock, just to be confusing. Correct - we better keep it as a generic, non-x86 topic as it affects other architectures. We can zap x86/memblock (it's fully contained in core/memblock) so that it's not confusing. Thanks, Ingo