From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750784Ab0JLEBb (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:01:31 -0400 Received: from TYO202.gate.nec.co.jp ([202.32.8.206]:58162 "EHLO tyo202.gate.nec.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750715Ab0JLEBa (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 00:01:30 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:56:13 +0900 From: Daisuke Nishimura To: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki Cc: Andrew Morton , Minchan Kim , Greg Thelen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, containers@lists.osdl.org, Andrea Righi , Balbir Singh , Daisuke Nishimura Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] memcg: reduce lock time at move charge (Was Re: [PATCH 04/10] memcg: disable local interrupts in lock_page_cgroup() Message-Id: <20101012125613.1accc1bd.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> In-Reply-To: <20101008194131.20b44a9d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> References: <1286175485-30643-1-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> <1286175485-30643-5-git-send-email-gthelen@google.com> <20101005160332.GB9515@barrios-desktop> <20101007093545.429fe04a.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101007105456.d86d8092.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20101007111743.322c3993.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101007152111.df687a62.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101007162811.c3a35be9.nishimura@mxp.nes.nec.co.jp> <20101007164204.83b207c6.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101007170405.27ed964c.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101007161454.84570cf9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101008133712.2a836331.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101007215556.21412ae6.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20101008141201.c1e3a4e2.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20101008194131.20b44a9d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.10.14; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > +err_out: > + for (; mt < info + num; mt++) > + if (mt->type == MC_TARGET_PAGE) { > + putback_lru_page(mt->val.page); Is this putback_lru_page() necessary ? is_target_pte_for_mc() doesn't isolate the page. Thanks, Daisuke Nishimura. > + put_page(mt->val.page); > + } > + goto out; > } > > static void mem_cgroup_move_charge(struct mm_struct *mm) >