From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932477Ab0JLNWy (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:22:54 -0400 Received: from cantor.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:33266 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932287Ab0JLNWx (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:22:53 -0400 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 06:22:08 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Daniel Suchy Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH: ftdi_sio new VID/PIDs for various Papouch devices Message-ID: <20101012132208.GB10556@suse.de> References: <4CB45E2A.9020407@danysek.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CB45E2A.9020407@danysek.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 03:10:02PM +0200, Daniel Suchy wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello, > in attached file, there's patch for FTDI USB serial converter adding new > VID/PIDs used on various devices manufactured by Papouch > (http://www.papouch.com). These devices have their own VID/PID, although > they're using standard FTDI chip. In ftdi_sio.c, I also made small > cleanup to have declarations for all Papouch devices in single section. > > My patch was tested against 2.6.35.x stable kernel releases at this time. > > With regards, > Daniel Suchy > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAky0XioACgkQ0m6yQqKjWoLPJACeMuWvkNTXWTOc4s8hW5Fy3U3k > 1+YAoNwbc3pYlSB734l3aSRO+Y+w12I5 > =y+9A > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > --- drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h.orig 2010-09-08 08:57:36.000000000 +0200 > +++ drivers/usb/serial/ftdi_sio_ids.h 2010-10-12 14:32:34.208586002 +0200 > @@ -1007,12 +1007,38 @@ > /* > * Papouch products (http://www.papouch.com/) > * Submitted by Folkert van Heusden > + * extended by Daniel Suchy (12.10.2010) This is not needed, you get this information from the changelog information. Care to take this line out, and add a "Signed-off-by:" line as per the Documentation/SubmittingPatches file? That's required for me to be able to accept the patch. thanks, greg k-h