From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753776Ab0JMLXx (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:23:53 -0400 Received: from canuck.infradead.org ([134.117.69.58]:37167 "EHLO canuck.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753609Ab0JMLXw (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:23:52 -0400 Date: Wed, 13 Oct 2010 07:23:51 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Kieran Bingham Cc: Marco Stornelli , Linux Kernel , Linux Embedded , Linux FS Devel , Tim Bird Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/16] pramfs: test module Message-ID: <20101013112351.GA16422@infradead.org> References: <4CB1EBDD.8050509@gmail.com> <4CB301E4.40405@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CB301E4.40405@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by canuck.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 01:24:04PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote: > >@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ > >+/* > >+ * FILE NAME fs/pramfs/namei.c > FILE NAME != namei.c Yes, that's why you should never do such filename comments which are not only utterly prone to be out of data, but also 100% useless.