mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	linux-main <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>,
	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	"Richard Woodruff" <r-woodruff2@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH .36-rc8] arm: mm: allow, but warn, when issuing ioremap() on RAM
Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:14:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101015201453.GB12981@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTinmAy13niqRKrray1Gk4hkr19tA2gWwYbfnFoh7@mail.gmail.com>

On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 11:00:40PM +0300, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 15, 2010 at 10:42 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > As soon as the first ARM merge hits during the merge window, I'll be
> > restoring the 'always fail' behaviour.
> 
> Ok, are you going to merge also your patch to use memblock for the
> initialization? Many drivers could certainly use that to fix the
> issue.

There's a lot of work going on with memblock in x86-land which impacts
ARM and means major conflicts for that patch - I think first we'll have
to deal with the fallout from that (iow, finding out what's been broken
by this activity and fix that), and then I'll have to re-do my patch from
the beginning.

Technically, following the rules, that means it has to miss this merge
window - so it looks like it's going to take another six months to solve
this issue (three months to get the memblock patch in, and another three
months for driver fixes to find their way through.)

I find these timescales (12 months) rather unacceptable to fix a problem
such as this.  Makes me wonder why I even bother trying.

  reply	other threads:[~2010-10-15 20:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-15 14:15 Felipe Contreras
2010-10-15 14:23 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2010-10-15 14:25 ` Felipe Contreras
2010-10-15 14:30 ` Catalin Marinas
2010-10-15 19:42   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2010-10-15 20:00     ` Felipe Contreras
2010-10-15 20:14       ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2010-10-17 12:06         ` Felipe Contreras
2010-10-17 12:33           ` Russell King - ARM Linux

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101015201453.GB12981@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=r-woodruff2@ti.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®