From: Glenn Wurster <gwurster@scs.carleton.ca>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, pekkas@netcore.fi, jmorris@namei.org,
yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, kaber@trash.net, shemminger@vyatta.com,
eric.dumazet@gmail.com, herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au,
ebiederm@xmission.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-2.6 v2] IPv6: Temp addresses are immediately deleted.
Date: Sat, 16 Oct 2010 14:42:17 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201010161442.18748.gwurster@scs.carleton.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100928.233028.112599117.davem@davemloft.net>
On September 29, 2010 02:30:28 am David Miller wrote:
> From: Glenn Wurster <gwurster@scs.carleton.ca>
> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:10:10 -0400
>
> > There is a bug in the interaction between ipv6_create_tempaddr and
> > addrconf_verify. Because ipv6_create_tempaddr uses the cstamp and tstamp
> > from the public address in creating a private address, if we have not
> > received a router advertisement in a while, tstamp + temp_valid_lft might
> > be < now. If this happens, the new address is created inside
> > ipv6_create_tempaddr, then the loop within addrconf_verify starts again
> > and the address is immediately deleted. We are left with no temporary
> > addresses on the interface, and no more will be created until the public
> > IP address is updated. To avoid this, set the expiry time to be the
> > minimum of the time left on the public address or the config option PLUS
> > the current age of the public interface.
> >
> > Version 2, now with 100% fewer line wraps. Thanks to David Miller for
> > pointing out the line wrapping issue.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Glenn Wurster <gwurster@scs.carleton.ca>
>
> This can only happen if we apply your other patch, which I showed
> was incorrect as per RFCs.
>
> We only create temporary address when public addresses are created,
> and this is the point where we are handling a router advertisement
> with non-zero Valid Lifetime.
>
> Therefore I'm not applying this patch either.
No, the first patch was to create a temporary address if none exists. Like
Brian Haley pointed out, that patch accommodates the case where we set
use_tempaddr to a non-zero value after the interface had been brought up.
This patch accommodates the case where the router is only broadcasting
advertisements every x seconds, and yet the user has set the valid_lft to be
something less than x. In this setup, the condition I mentioned in the patch
description happens, where the new temporary address is created, but the last
modification time on that temporary address is set to the time of the last
router advertisement, which was more than valid_lft seconds ago. In this
case, the temporary address is immediately deleted, and we are left with no
temporary address on the interface. Furthermore, because all temporary
addresses get deleted by the time the next router advertisement arrives, we
are left with not being able to use temporary addresses until we move
networks.
I tested this patch alone, and it works as intended, allowing temporary
addresses to continue to be created and deleted between received router
advertisements.
You can easily test the bug by setting tmp_valid_lft to 60 and then running
radvd. The defaults for radvd seem to be a minimum retransmit on unsolicited
router advertisements of 200 seconds (http://linux.die.net/man/5/radvd.conf),
much higher than the 60 seconds it is going to take for the temporary address
to expire.
Glenn.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-16 18:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-09-27 17:10 Glenn Wurster
2010-09-29 6:30 ` David Miller
2010-10-16 18:42 ` Glenn Wurster [this message]
2010-10-26 19:19 ` David Miller
2010-10-26 19:38 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201010161442.18748.gwurster@scs.carleton.ca \
--to=gwurster@scs.carleton.ca \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.hengli.com.au \
--cc=jmorris@namei.org \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pekkas@netcore.fi \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
--cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®