From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758536Ab0JSLqO (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:46:14 -0400 Received: from mx3.mail.elte.hu ([157.181.1.138]:39226 "EHLO mx3.mail.elte.hu" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758484Ab0JSLqM (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 07:46:12 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 13:45:01 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Arjan van de Ven , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tejun Heo , Frederic Weisbecker , Pierre Tardy , Jean Pihet , linux-trace-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org, rjw@sisk.pl, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra , Kevin Hilman , Steven Rostedt , Frank Eigler , Masami Hiramatsu , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: PATCH [0/4] perf: clean-up of power events API Message-ID: <20101019114501.GA25371@elte.hu> References: <201010062334.46971.trenn@suse.de> <4CB095FA.8060803@linux.intel.com> <20101010121928.GA2688@elte.hu> <201010191331.03080.trenn@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010191331.03080.trenn@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17) X-ELTE-SpamScore: -2.0 X-ELTE-SpamLevel: X-ELTE-SpamCheck: no X-ELTE-SpamVersion: ELTE 2.0 X-ELTE-SpamCheck-Details: score=-2.0 required=5.9 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no SpamAssassin version=3.2.5 -2.0 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Thomas Renninger wrote: > > Most definitely. It's no accident that it took such a long time for this issue > > to be raised in the first place. It's a rare occurance - > > Do you agree that this occurance happened now and these events should get cleaned > up before ARM and other archs make use of the broken interface? > > If not, discussing this further, is a big waste of time... and Jean would have to > try to adapt his ARM code on the broken ABI... The discussion seems to have died down somewhat. Please re-send to lkml the latest patches you have to remind everyone of the latest state of things - the merge window is getting near. My only compatibility/ABI point is basically that it shouldnt break _existing_ tracepoints (and users thereof). If your latest bits meet that then it ought to be a good first step. You are free to (and encouraged to) introduce more complete sets of events. Thanks, Ingo