From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752069Ab0JTNZv (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:25:51 -0400 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([92.198.50.35]:59933 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751146Ab0JTNZu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:25:50 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 15:25:49 +0200 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Nguyen Dinh-R00091 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux@arm.linux.org.uk, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, daniel@caiaq.de, Zhang Lily-R58066 , valentin.longchamp@epfl.ch Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: imx: change mx51.h into mx5x.h Message-ID: <20101020132549.GB19834@pengutronix.de> References: <1287525423-22329-1-git-send-email-Dinh.Nguyen@freescale.com> <20101020090122.GH28166@pengutronix.de> <20101020113550.GL2562@matterhorn.lan> <20101020130903.GA19834@pengutronix.de> <86A0E76937111F4C92FABEC0A2098851051D5B0F@az33exm21> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <86A0E76937111F4C92FABEC0A2098851051D5B0F@az33exm21> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:6f8:1178:2:215:17ff:fe12:23b0 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 06:15:53AM -0700, Nguyen Dinh-R00091 wrote: > I guess I should also ask this question now. I was planning to add > support for mx53 kernel that will be binary compatible with mx51. I'm > guessing that you are not in support of that idea? With "binary compatible" you mean you want to build a kernel that runs on both, mx51 and mx53 machines? Yes, I definitly want that, that's one of the main reasons to do that consolidation. Thanks Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |