From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755611Ab0JVLL4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:11:56 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([18.85.46.34]:57114 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751627Ab0JVLL4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:11:56 -0400 Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:11:53 -0400 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] llseek conversion Message-ID: <20101022111152.GA21969@infradead.org> References: <201010221310.08449.arnd@arndb.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201010221310.08449.arnd@arndb.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > There are a few new drivers in linux-next that introduce additional > file_operations. These can all use no_llseek and I can follow up > with a patch to make that explicit when they get merged. I don't think there's any reason to make that explicit. In fact once your transition has settled we can just kill no_llseek. Thanks for doing this work!