From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755936Ab0JVLTW (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:19:22 -0400 Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de ([212.227.17.8]:61729 "EHLO moutng.kundenserver.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754270Ab0JVLTU (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:19:20 -0400 From: Arnd Bergmann To: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] llseek conversion Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 13:18:36 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.36-next-20101021+; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Linus Torvalds , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <201010221310.08449.arnd@arndb.de> <20101022111152.GA21969@infradead.org> In-Reply-To: <20101022111152.GA21969@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010221318.36457.arnd@arndb.de> X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:JSmY4JibThGggXjBTW0DOKbVJAa/fsPj/dUqpWdTM8X wjPFLyqCWnUZ4cRMl3vh8Qv9vEAvVrlTPU52fiVz/W/TrX/7Fc bb2+CgCB9G3Ldoho5PPtHpGviV0bR88ADO6TSNOhHDXhED8pvi A8s64ebmd8AMs2JZPvAExW+y/38X3ZuJO+3WGCfH9/aSkvCPXM oM+8a9PxOc0osOT/KtgQg== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Friday 22 October 2010 13:11:53 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 01:10:08PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > There are a few new drivers in linux-next that introduce additional > > file_operations. These can all use no_llseek and I can follow up > > with a patch to make that explicit when they get merged. > > I don't think there's any reason to make that explicit. In fact once > your transition has settled we can just kill no_llseek. Fair enough. I thought about leaving out all no_llseek instances right away, but I left them in because that allowed me to verify that my script actually caught every single instance. Arnd