From: Matt Helsley <matthltc@us.ibm.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: "akpm >> Andrew Morton" <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
containers@lists.linux-foundation.org,
Paul Menage <menage@google.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cgroup hierarchy
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:38:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101022213819.GK10119@count0.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC146D4.7030009@cn.fujitsu.com>
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:09:56PM +0800, Li Zefan wrote:
> Stephane posted a patchset to add perf_cgroup subsystem, so perf can
> be used to monitor all threads belonging to a cgroup.
>
> But if you already mounted a cgroup hierarchy but without perf_cgroup
> and the hierarchy has sub-cgroups, you can't bind perf_cgroup to it,
> and thus you're not able to use per-cgroup perf feature.
>
> This patchset alleviates the pain, and then a subsytem can be bind/unbind
> to/from a hierarchy which has sub-cgroups in it.
>
> For a cgroup subsystem to become bindable, the can_bind flag of
> struct cgroup_subsys should be set, and provide ->bind() callback
> if necessary.
>
> But for some constraints, not all subsystems can take advantage of
> this patch. For example, we can't decide a cgroup's cpuset.mems and
> cpuset.cpus automatically, so cpuset is not bindable.
<snip>
> diff --git a/kernel/cgroup.c b/kernel/cgroup.c
> index 6c36750..46df5f8 100644
> --- a/kernel/cgroup.c
> +++ b/kernel/cgroup.c
<snip>
> +/*
> + * cgroup_walk_herarchy - iterate through a cgroup hierarchy
> + * @process_cgroup: callback called on each cgroup in the hierarchy
> + * @data: will be passed to @process_cgroup
> + * @top_cgrp: the root cgroup of the hierarchy
> + *
> + * For such a hierarchy:
> + * a1 c1
> + * / /
> + * Root - a2 - b1 - c2
> + * \
> + * a3
> + *
> + * The iterating order is: a1, a2, b1, c1, c2, a3. So a parent will be
> + * processed before its children.
> + */
You could just say it's a depth-first walk except we process the parent before
its children.
> +static int cgroup_walk_hierarchy(int (*process_cgroup)(struct cgroup *, void *),
> + void *data, struct cgroup *top_cgrp)
<snip>
> +static int hierarchy_populate_dir(struct cgroup *cgrp, void *data)
> +{
> + mutex_lock_nested(&cgrp->dentry->d_inode->i_mutex, I_MUTEX_CHILD);
> + cgroup_populate_dir(cgrp);
> + mutex_unlock(&cgrp->dentry->d_inode->i_mutex);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Call with cgroup_mutex held. Drops reference counts on modules, including
> * any duplicate ones that parse_cgroupfs_options took. If this function
> @@ -945,36 +1079,53 @@ static int rebind_subsystems(struct cgroupfs_root *root,
> unsigned long added_bits, removed_bits;
> struct cgroup *cgrp = &root->top_cgroup;
> int i;
> + int err;
>
> BUG_ON(!mutex_is_locked(&cgroup_mutex));
>
> removed_bits = root->actual_subsys_bits & ~final_bits;
> added_bits = final_bits & ~root->actual_subsys_bits;
> +
> /* Check that any added subsystems are currently free */
> - for (i = 0; i < CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT; i++) {
> - unsigned long bit = 1UL << i;
> - struct cgroup_subsys *ss = subsys[i];
> - if (!(bit & added_bits))
> - continue;
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &added_bits, CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT) {
> /*
> * Nobody should tell us to do a subsys that doesn't exist:
> * parse_cgroupfs_options should catch that case and refcounts
> * ensure that subsystems won't disappear once selected.
> */
> - BUG_ON(ss == NULL);
> - if (ss->root != &rootnode) {
> + BUG_ON(subsys[i] == NULL);
> + if (subsys[i]->root != &rootnode) {
> /* Subsystem isn't free */
> return -EBUSY;
> }
> }
>
> - /* Currently we don't handle adding/removing subsystems when
> - * any child cgroups exist. This is theoretically supportable
> - * but involves complex error handling, so it's being left until
> - * later */
> - if (root->number_of_cgroups > 1)
> + /* removing will be supported later */
> + if (root->number_of_cgroups > 1 && removed_bits)
> return -EBUSY;
>
> + if (root->number_of_cgroups > 1) {
Is there something wrong with the indentation here? I can't
see the closing brace for the "if (root->number_of_cgroups > 1)"
that should precede the for_each_set_bit() loop below.
> + for_each_set_bit(i, &added_bits, CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT)
> + if (!subsys[i]->can_bind)
> + return -EBUSY;
I think you could avoid the can_bind flag field entirely and do:
if (!subsys[i]->bind)
Also, if we're going with my "split out unbind" suggestion I think
the part here would be:
for_each_set_bit(i, &removed_bits, CGROUP_SUBSYS_COUNT)
if (!subsys[i]->unbind)
return -EBUSY;
<snip>
Cheers,
-Matt Helsley
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-22 8:09 [PATCH 0/7] cgroups: Allow to bind/unbind subsystems to/from non-trival hierarchy Li Zefan
2010-10-22 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] cgroups: Shrink struct cgroup_subsys Li Zefan
2010-10-28 23:34 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-08 5:23 ` Li Zefan
2010-11-09 21:05 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-10 0:52 ` Li Zefan
2010-11-10 1:53 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-10 2:06 ` Li Zefan
2010-11-10 2:15 ` Paul Menage
2010-10-22 8:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] cgroups: Allow to bind a subsystem to a cgroup hierarchy Li Zefan
2010-10-22 12:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-25 0:59 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-22 21:38 ` Matt Helsley [this message]
2010-10-25 1:23 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-28 23:57 ` Paul Menage
2010-10-28 23:55 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-08 5:26 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-22 8:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] cgroups: Allow to unbind subsystem from a cgroup hierarachy Li Zefan
2010-10-29 0:02 ` Paul Menage
2010-10-22 8:11 ` [PATCH 4/7] cgroups: Mark some subsystems bindable Li Zefan
2010-10-22 8:11 ` [PATCH 5/7] cgroups: Make freezer subsystem bindable Li Zefan
2010-10-22 20:57 ` Matt Helsley
2010-10-22 21:46 ` Matt Helsley
2010-10-29 0:06 ` Paul Menage
2010-10-22 21:57 ` Matt Helsley
2010-10-25 1:15 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-22 8:12 ` [PATCH 6/7] cgroups: Warn if a bindable subsystem calls css_get() Li Zefan
2010-10-29 0:05 ` Paul Menage
2010-10-22 8:12 ` [PATCH 7/7] cgroups: Update documentation for bindable subsystems Li Zefan
2010-10-25 0:36 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2010-10-25 0:52 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-25 0:56 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-29 0:13 ` Paul Menage
2010-10-29 0:15 ` Paul Menage
2010-11-08 5:27 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-22 12:50 ` [PATCH 0/7] cgroups: Allow to bind/unbind subsystems to/from non-trival hierarchy Peter Zijlstra
2010-10-25 1:07 ` Li Zefan
2010-10-28 23:33 ` Paul Menage
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101022213819.GK10119@count0.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=matthltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizf@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=menage@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®