mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "J.A. Magallón" <jamagallon@ono.com>
To: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: CIFS is slooow, gvfs is fast
Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2010 00:46:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101023004636.1acdd81c@werewolf.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CC16B1E.4060709@suse.de>

On Fri, 22 Oct 2010 16:14:46 +0530, Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de> wrote:

> (Cc linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org)
> 
> On 10/22/2010 05:05 AM, J.A. Magallón wrote:
> 
> > I have a very strange behaviour with windows networking.
> > I have an HTPC, which I access from my Linux desktop. It runs Windows 7.
> > Network is GigaBit, routed by a Linksys WRT320N running latest DD-WRT.
> > I setup an automount path under /net/htpc with CIFS filesystem.
> > I can also access the drives in HTPC via gvfs from Gnome DE.
> > 
> > Problem: speed is _VERY_ different.
> > R/W through the automount point (CIFS fs), is roughly 7-8 MB/s (ridiculous
> > for gigabit speeds).
> > R/W through Gnome/gvfs (kind of fuse) goes around 35 - 40 MB/s (400 Mbits/s),
> > that look much better.
> 
> What is the kernel version In which you are seeing the problem? I'm not

Its just new 2.6.36 final, mandriva distro kernel.

> seeing this on 2.6.36-rc4. Do you have a wired interface as well? Are

Yes, boxes are all wired to the 320N router, at gigabit speeds.
Just to double check, I also probed with my netbook with 100Mb ehternet.
The effect is less obvious, but writing to the Win7 box through the
cifs automount path goes at 3.5-4.0 Mb/s, and with gvfs it reaches
7.5 Mb/s.

> you sure that both are using the same network path?
> 

If you mean hardware network path (cabling, router), yes.
For file paths, CIFS fs is under /net/htpc/media, and gvfs uses a mount
point on '~/.gvfs/media on htpc'.

And here comes the weird part. To rule out the desktop environment factor,
I tried a dd in both paths. On /net, I get 16.6 MB/s, and on
~/.gvfs/xxx, I just get 5.5 MB/s. I really don't understand anything...
things get reversed depending if you use a gui or commandline.

Weird, really weird...

-- 
J.A. Magallon <jamagallon()ono!com>     \               Software is like sex:
                                         \         It's better when it's free

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-10-22 22:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-10-21 23:35 J.A. Magallón
2010-10-22 10:44 ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-10-22 16:06   ` Steve French
2010-10-22 22:46   ` J.A. Magallón [this message]
2010-10-23 23:30     ` J.A. Magallón
2010-10-25 10:14       ` Suresh Jayaraman
2010-10-29 22:33         ` J.A. Magallón
2010-10-30  0:54           ` Steve French

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101023004636.1acdd81c@werewolf.home \
    --to=jamagallon@ono.com \
    --cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®