From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753936Ab0JYVQ4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:16:56 -0400 Received: from g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com ([15.192.0.45]:39609 "EHLO g5t0008.atlanta.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752085Ab0JYVQy (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 17:16:54 -0400 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Jesse Barnes Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] x86: allocate space within a region top-down Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:15:29 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.2 (Linux/2.6.32-25-generic; KDE/4.4.2; x86_64; ; ) Cc: Bob Picco , Brian Bloniarz , Charles Butterfield , Denys Vlasenko , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Horst H. von Brand" , Ingo Molnar , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Stefan Becker , "H. Peter Anvin" , Yinghai Lu , Leann Ogasawara , Linus Torvalds , Thomas Gleixner , Chuck Ebbert References: <20101014231804.536.62138.stgit@bob.kio> <20101025140154.66f1e1bd@jbarnes-desktop> <201010251508.49165.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> In-Reply-To: <201010251508.49165.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010251515.30491.bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Monday, October 25, 2010 03:08:48 pm Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Monday, October 25, 2010 03:01:54 pm Jesse Barnes wrote: > > On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:18:52 -0600 > > Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > Request that allocate_resource() use available space from high addresses > > > first, rather than the default of using low addresses first. > > > > > > The most common place this makes a difference is when we move or assign > > > new PCI device resources. Low addresses are generally scarce, so it's > > > better to use high addresses when possible. This follows Windows practice > > > for PCI allocation. > > > > Applied this series to linux-next; assuming nothing blows up I'll send > > it to Linus this week (previous versions got some testing and landed in > > a separate branch so this should be fine). > > We tripped over another issue in Fedora: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=646027 By the way, it's been a *great* help to have Fedora being willing to go out on a limb and help get these tested. I know it sucks to get those Rawhide bug reports, but they have been extremely useful to me. Thanks! Bjorn