From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1759606Ab0JZNBs (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:01:48 -0400
Received: from fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.35]:34287 "EHLO
	fgwmail5.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757829Ab0JZNBr (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:01:47 -0400
X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Subject: Re: [resend][PATCH 2/4] Revert "oom: deprecate oom_adj tunable"
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@kvack.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010251338081.21737@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
References: <20101025122723.916D.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <alpine.DEB.2.00.1010251338081.21737@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Message-Id: <20101026220237.B7DA.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2010 22:01:40 +0900 (JST)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> On Mon, 25 Oct 2010, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> 
> > oom_adj is not only used for kernel knob, but also used for
> > application interface. Then, adding new knob is no good
> > reason to deprecate it. Don't do stupid!
> > 
> 
> NACK as a logical follow-up to my NACK for "oom: remove totalpage 
> normalization from oom_badness()"

Huh?

I requested you show us justification. BUT YOU DIDNT. If you have any 
usecase, show us RIGHT NOW. 

Don't speaking sucking crap. If you don't want ignore you. you are busy
than you.

DONT STUPID.