mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
Cc: Kees Cook <kees.cook@canonical.com>,
	Siarhei Liakh <sliakh.lkml@gmail.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [Security] proactive defense: using read-only memory, RO/NX modules
Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2010 10:03:42 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101108100342.61dde238@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101108061324.GA30540@elte.hu>

> Nice! IMHO we need more of that. (If the readonly section gets big enough in 
> practice we could perhaps even mark it large-page in the future. It could serve as 
> an allocator to module code as well - that would probably be a speedup even for 
> modules.)

You ideally want one other thing to go with it. While a non-guest can't
support it the marking of pages "permanently and irrevocably" readonly in
a guest is something a hypedvisor can happily enforce and provide for the
lifetime of the guest.

Alan

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-08 10:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-07 19:35 [Security] proactive defense: using read-only memory Kees Cook
2010-11-08  6:13 ` [Security] proactive defense: using read-only memory, RO/NX modules Ingo Molnar
2010-11-08 10:03   ` Alan Cox [this message]
2010-11-08 21:42   ` Kees Cook
2010-11-10  9:04     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-11  6:56       ` Kees Cook
2010-11-11  9:07         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-13 19:59       ` matthieu castet
2010-11-14  9:56         ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-17 10:00 ` [Security] proactive defense: using read-only memory Pavel Machek
2010-11-17 22:14   ` Kees Cook
2011-01-02  9:09     ` Pavel Machek
2010-11-18  0:12   ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101108100342.61dde238@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --to=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arjan@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=kees.cook@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
    --cc=sliakh.lkml@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®