From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] staging: ft1000: Fix compilation warning.
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 08:38:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101110083814.55e222c4.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1289384128-19823-1-git-send-email-marek.belisko@gmail.com>
On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 11:15:26 +0100 Marek Belisko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Marek Belisko <marek.belisko@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
a. always include the warning or error message that the patch fixes
b. (quoting from another email yesterday:)
so in your analysis of this compiler warning, was the warning correct & justified,
or was it false? I.e., is the init to NULL needed?
If it was false, could we just silence the warning by using:
struct ft1000_info *unitialized_var(pft1000info);
plus #include <linux/compiler.h> ?
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c
> index 99e3339..b7c4602 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_usb.c
> @@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ static int ft1000_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
> int i, ret = 0, size;
>
> struct ft1000_device *ft1000dev;
> - struct ft1000_info *pft1000info;
> + struct ft1000_info *pft1000info = NULL;
> const struct firmware *dsp_fw;
>
> ft1000dev = kmalloc(sizeof(struct ft1000_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> --
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-10 16:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-10 10:15 Marek Belisko
2010-11-10 10:15 ` [PATCH 2/3] staging: ft1000: Remove unused char dev inerface Marek Belisko
2010-11-11 0:26 ` Greg KH
2010-11-13 19:05 ` Belisko Marek
2010-11-16 19:36 ` Greg KH
2010-11-18 8:43 ` Belisko Marek
2010-11-20 1:16 ` Greg KH
2010-11-10 10:15 ` [PATCH 3/3] staging: ft1000: Remove unused variables Marek Belisko
2010-11-10 16:38 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
2010-11-12 9:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] staging: ft1000: Fix compilation warning Belisko Marek
2010-11-12 16:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-11-11 0:29 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101110083814.55e222c4.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marek.belisko@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®