mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
To: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
Cc: stable@kernel.org, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [git pull 2.6.36.stable] intel_idle patches for 2.6.36.stable
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 10:49:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101115184944.GB9597@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1011151227190.2939@x980>

On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 12:29:05PM -0500, Len Brown wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> please pull from: 
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/lenb/linux-idle-2.6.36.git idle-release
> 
> to sync 2.6.36.y with upstream changes to the intel_idle driver.
> 
> After applying this series, 2.6.36.y and upstream intel_idle.c
> are identical.

That's nice, but why would I do this?  I need git commit ids for the
upstream patches that went into Linus's tree, and they should only be
bug fixes or other stuff that is applicable for -stable.

> commit 935558a7fefe0a307618857ad8a06e8a485b3b47
> Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Date:   Wed Jul 7 00:12:03 2010 -0400
> 
>     intel_idle: add initial Sandy Bridge support
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Is this patch really ok for -stable?  What is the git commit id of it in
Linus's tree?

> commit 1768bd405dc30d4db74af5eb693d6c2d3389c5a6
> Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Date:   Fri Oct 15 21:23:25 2010 -0400
> 
>     intel_idle: delete bogus data from cpuidle_state.power_usage
>     
>     The mW data in this field is a total fabrication
>     and serves no purpose other than to mislead
>     those who might see it in sysfs.  Delete it.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> 
> commit 645fd1ddc110eea7ab596b6fa27add5cff912e84
> Author: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
> Date:   Fri Oct 15 20:43:06 2010 -0400
> 
>     intel_idle: simplify test for leave_mm()
>     
>     A run-time test to invoke leave_mm() for the deepest
>     supported C-state is redundant, since the appropriate
>     C-states already have flags with CPUIDLE_FLAG_TLB_FLUSHED set.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>

Is this patch really for -stable?

> commit 27a52cf2d75b81e762c8fc41fd8fca3dac2aa8ca
> Author: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Fri Sep 17 15:36:40 2010 -0700
> 
>     x86, mwait: Move mwait constants to a common header file
>     
>     We have MWAIT constants spread across three different .c files, for no
>     good reason.  Move them all into a common header file.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@linux.intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
>     Cc: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
>     LKML-Reference: <tip-*@git.kernel.org>

Why would this be ok for -stable?

While I understand you would like the driver to be the same in both
kernel versions, you still have to follow the normal -stable rules.

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-15 18:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-15 17:29 Len Brown
2010-11-15 18:49 ` Greg KH [this message]
2010-11-17  7:06   ` [stable] " Len Brown
2010-11-17  7:44   ` Len Brown
2010-11-17  8:28 ` Len Brown
2010-11-17  8:33   ` Len Brown
2010-11-22 18:36     ` [linux-pm] " Len Brown
2010-11-22 18:45       ` [stable] " Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101115184944.GB9597@kroah.com \
    --to=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=stable@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome