From: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett@gmail.com>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Jordi Pujol <jordipujolp@gmail.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Galbraith patch
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 19:05:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201011191905.03889.gene.heskett@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1290183668.24581.16.camel@maggy.simson.net>
On Friday, November 19, 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>On Fri, 2010-11-19 at 10:05 -0500, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> On Friday, November 19, 2010, Jordi Pujol wrote:
>> >Hello,
>> >
>> >it requires a little modification,
>> >
>> >CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG should not be a condition to create autogroup in
>> >structure task_group
>> >
>> >remove
>> >
>> > && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG)
>> >
>> >in the following conditional:
>> >
>> >+++ linux-2.6.36/kernel/sched.c
>> >@@ -78,6 +78,7 @@
>> >
>> > #include "sched_cpupri.h"
>> > #include "workqueue_sched.h"
>> >
>> >+#include "sched_autogroup.h"
>> >
>> > #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
>> > #include <trace/events/sched.h>
>> >
>> >@@ -268,6 +269,10 @@ struct task_group {
>> >
>> > struct task_group *parent;
>> > struct list_head siblings;
>> > struct list_head children;
>> >
>> >+
>> >+#if (defined(CONFIG_SCHED_AUTOGROUP) && defined(CONFIG_SCHED_DEBUG))
>> >+ struct autogroup *autogroup;
>> >+#endif
>> >
>> > };
>> >
>> >Kind,
>> >
>> >Jordi Pujol
>>
>> Thanks Jordi, but my last attempted build, using only the last 2
>> patches that Mike posted on a fresh unpack of 2.6.36, couldn't get
>> past stage 2 of the modules build, it kept squawking about all the IR
>> control stuff that is not even configured to be built.
>
>No idea what's going on with that. Maybe you should wait until I get
>the /proc display/tweak interface cobbled together and post a checked
>over patch instead of hasty WIP snapshot.
I have come to that conclusion of too. But because I am interested in an
improvement in this 'interactivity' of the desktop, I was willing to give
even the WIP a try. If what I report helps you, then my testing effort is
not wasted. The more eyes and different hdwe theory. ;-)
Thanks Mike.
>> I wonder how long it will take to get work this into mainline?
>
>If it goes in at all, it won't be before .38.
I was hoping sooner. Some of us could use the help this seems to promise.
>> Along the same line, how does this compare to CK's bfs patch?
>
>Like apple vs orange.
>
And they both contain too much sugar for me. Dammit.
> -Mike
--
Cheers, Gene
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Deliberation, n.:
The act of examining one's bread to determine which side it is
buttered on.
-- Ambrose Bierce, "The Devil's Dictionary"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-20 0:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-17 18:35 Gilberto Nunes
2010-11-17 18:58 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-11-17 18:59 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-11-17 19:00 ` Dhaval Giani
2010-11-17 19:22 ` Gilberto Nunes
[not found] ` <1290021497.4887.24.camel@note-311a>
2010-11-17 23:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-17 23:36 ` Gilberto Nunes
2010-11-18 15:43 ` Gilberto Nunes
2010-11-18 16:06 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-18 16:40 ` Gilberto Nunes
2010-11-18 18:40 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-11-18 19:35 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-18 20:10 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-18 21:29 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-18 20:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-18 21:16 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-11-18 21:36 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-18 21:28 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-18 22:29 ` Thomas Backlund
2010-11-19 14:09 ` Jordi Pujol
2010-11-19 15:05 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-19 16:21 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-20 0:05 ` Gene Heskett [this message]
2010-11-19 16:49 ` Jordi Pujol
2010-11-19 17:11 ` Gilberto Nunes
2010-11-19 16:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-18 19:32 ` Gene Heskett
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201011191905.03889.gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--to=gene.heskett@gmail.com \
--cc=efault@gmx.de \
--cc=jordipujolp@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome