From: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org
Cc: stable-review@kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
"Maciej Żenczykowski" <maze@google.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: [63/82] net: Fix IPv6 PMTU disc. w/ asymmetric routes
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 13:56:24 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101119215643.917694582@clark.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101119215658.GA7804@kroah.com
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2061 bytes --]
2.6.35-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
------------------
From: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
[ Upstream commit ae878ae280bea286ff2b1e1cb6e609dd8cb4501d ]
Signed-off-by: Maciej Żenczykowski <maze@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -1559,14 +1559,13 @@ out:
* i.e. Path MTU discovery
*/
-void rt6_pmtu_discovery(struct in6_addr *daddr, struct in6_addr *saddr,
- struct net_device *dev, u32 pmtu)
+static void rt6_do_pmtu_disc(struct in6_addr *daddr, struct in6_addr *saddr,
+ struct net *net, u32 pmtu, int ifindex)
{
struct rt6_info *rt, *nrt;
- struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
int allfrag = 0;
- rt = rt6_lookup(net, daddr, saddr, dev->ifindex, 0);
+ rt = rt6_lookup(net, daddr, saddr, ifindex, 0);
if (rt == NULL)
return;
@@ -1634,6 +1633,27 @@ out:
dst_release(&rt->u.dst);
}
+void rt6_pmtu_discovery(struct in6_addr *daddr, struct in6_addr *saddr,
+ struct net_device *dev, u32 pmtu)
+{
+ struct net *net = dev_net(dev);
+
+ /*
+ * RFC 1981 states that a node "MUST reduce the size of the packets it
+ * is sending along the path" that caused the Packet Too Big message.
+ * Since it's not possible in the general case to determine which
+ * interface was used to send the original packet, we update the MTU
+ * on the interface that will be used to send future packets. We also
+ * update the MTU on the interface that received the Packet Too Big in
+ * case the original packet was forced out that interface with
+ * SO_BINDTODEVICE or similar. This is the next best thing to the
+ * correct behaviour, which would be to update the MTU on all
+ * interfaces.
+ */
+ rt6_do_pmtu_disc(daddr, saddr, net, pmtu, 0);
+ rt6_do_pmtu_disc(daddr, saddr, net, pmtu, dev->ifindex);
+}
+
/*
* Misc support functions
*/
reply other threads:[~2010-11-19 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101119215643.917694582@clark.site \
--to=gregkh@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maze@google.com \
--cc=stable-review@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®