From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path
Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2010 19:46:03 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101122214602.GB7678@amt.cnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101122141925.GA30902@amt.cnet>
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 12:19:25PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 11:45:18AM +0800, Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> > On 11/20/2010 12:11 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >
> > >> void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> > >> {
> > >> + int dirty_count = atomic_read(&kvm->tlbs_dirty);
> > >> +
> > >> + smp_mb();
> > >> if (make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH))
> > >> ++kvm->stat.remote_tlb_flush;
> > >> + atomic_sub(dirty_count, &kvm->tlbs_dirty);
> > >> }
> > >
> > > This is racy because kvm_flush_remote_tlbs might be called without
> > > mmu_lock protection.
> >
> > Sorry for my carelessness, it should be 'cmpxchg' here.
> >
> > > You could decrease the counter on
> > > invalidate_page/invalidate_range_start only,
> >
> > I want to avoid a unnecessary tlbs flush, if tlbs have been flushed
> > after sync_page, then we don't need flush tlbs on invalidate_page/
> > invalidate_range_start path.
> >
> > > these are not fast paths
> > > anyway.
> > >
> >
> > How about below patch? it just needs one atomic operation.
> >
> > ---
> > arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h | 4 ++--
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 2 ++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 7 ++++++-
> > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > index dfb906f..e64192f 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
> > @@ -781,14 +781,14 @@ static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
> > gfn = gpte_to_gfn(gpte);
> >
> > if (FNAME(map_invalid_gpte)(vcpu, sp, &sp->spt[i], gpte)) {
> > - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
> > + vcpu->kvm->tlbs_dirty++;
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > if (gfn != sp->gfns[i]) {
> > drop_spte(vcpu->kvm, &sp->spt[i],
> > shadow_trap_nonpresent_pte);
> > - kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(vcpu->kvm);
> > + vcpu->kvm->tlbs_dirty++;
> > continue;
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > index 4bd663d..dafd90e 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -249,6 +249,7 @@ struct kvm {
> > struct mmu_notifier mmu_notifier;
> > unsigned long mmu_notifier_seq;
> > long mmu_notifier_count;
> > + long tlbs_dirty;
> > #endif
> > };
> >
> > @@ -377,6 +378,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_on_spin(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_resched(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_load_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > void kvm_put_guest_fpu(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> > +
> > void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm);
> > void kvm_reload_remote_mmus(struct kvm *kvm);
> >
> > diff --git a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > index fb93ff9..fe0a1a7 100644
> > --- a/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > +++ b/virt/kvm/kvm_main.c
> > @@ -168,8 +168,12 @@ static bool make_all_cpus_request(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned int req)
> >
> > void kvm_flush_remote_tlbs(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > + long dirty_count = kvm->tlbs_dirty;
> > +
> > + smp_mb();
> > if (make_all_cpus_request(kvm, KVM_REQ_TLB_FLUSH))
> > ++kvm->stat.remote_tlb_flush;
>
> <---
>
> > + cmpxchg(&kvm->tlbs_dirty, dirty_count, 0);
> > }
>
>
> Still problematic, if tlbs_dirty is set in the point indicated above.
>
> Invalidate page should be quite rare, so checking for tlb_dirty only
> there is OK.
>
My bad, the patch is fine.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-22 21:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-19 9:01 [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: MMU: fix forgot flush " Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-19 9:02 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] KVM: MMU: don't drop spte if overwrite it from W to RO Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-19 9:03 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] KVM: MMU: rename 'reset_host_protection' to 'host_writable' Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-19 9:04 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] KVM: MMU: remove 'clear_unsync' parameter Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-19 9:04 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] KVM: MMU: abstract invalid guest pte mapping Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-22 9:28 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-22 10:18 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-22 10:17 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-23 3:08 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-19 9:05 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] KVM: MMU: delay flush all tlbs on sync_page path Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-19 16:11 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-22 3:45 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-22 14:19 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-22 21:46 ` Marcelo Tosatti [this message]
2010-11-23 3:13 ` Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-26 1:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] KVM: MMU: fix forgot flush " Xiao Guangrong
2010-11-26 14:29 ` Marcelo Tosatti
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101122214602.GB7678@amt.cnet \
--to=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®