mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change return type of obvious Boolean list fns to "bool".
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:16:58 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101123111658.8bfb91cd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011210819350.25385@localhost6.localdomain6>

On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:35:04 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote:

> 
> It's clear that a number of basic list routines return simply a
> Boolean value, so change their return type from "int" to "bool".
> 
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
> 

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>

with allmodconfig on i386 and x86_64.


> ---
> 
>   Compile-tested with defconfig on x86_64.  Not sure who should
> be CCed when a patch touches something this basic.  Andrew?
> 
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
> index 9a5f8a7..1d6ed55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/list.h
> +++ b/include/linux/list.h
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static inline void list_move_tail(struct list_head *list,
>   * @list: the entry to test
>   * @head: the head of the list
>   */
> -static inline int list_is_last(const struct list_head *list,
> +static inline bool list_is_last(const struct list_head *list,
>  				const struct list_head *head)
>  {
>  	return list->next == head;
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline int list_is_last(const struct list_head *list,
>   * list_empty - tests whether a list is empty
>   * @head: the list to test.
>   */
> -static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
> +static inline bool list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
>  {
>  	return head->next == head;
>  }
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
>   * to the list entry is list_del_init(). Eg. it cannot be used
>   * if another CPU could re-list_add() it.
>   */
> -static inline int list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
> +static inline bool list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
>  {
>  	struct list_head *next = head->next;
>  	return (next == head) && (next == head->prev);
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static inline void list_rotate_left(struct list_head *head)
>   * list_is_singular - tests whether a list has just one entry.
>   * @head: the list to test.
>   */
> -static inline int list_is_singular(const struct list_head *head)
> +static inline bool list_is_singular(const struct list_head *head)
>  {
>  	return !list_empty(head) && (head->next == head->prev);
>  }


---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***

      parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-23 19:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-21 13:35 Robert P. J. Day
2010-11-22  4:59 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-11-23 19:16 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101123111658.8bfb91cd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome