From: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Change return type of obvious Boolean list fns to "bool".
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 11:16:58 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101123111658.8bfb91cd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1011210819350.25385@localhost6.localdomain6>
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:35:04 -0500 (EST) Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> It's clear that a number of basic list routines return simply a
> Boolean value, so change their return type from "int" to "bool".
>
> Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
with allmodconfig on i386 and x86_64.
> ---
>
> Compile-tested with defconfig on x86_64. Not sure who should
> be CCed when a patch touches something this basic. Andrew?
>
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/list.h b/include/linux/list.h
> index 9a5f8a7..1d6ed55 100644
> --- a/include/linux/list.h
> +++ b/include/linux/list.h
> @@ -167,7 +167,7 @@ static inline void list_move_tail(struct list_head *list,
> * @list: the entry to test
> * @head: the head of the list
> */
> -static inline int list_is_last(const struct list_head *list,
> +static inline bool list_is_last(const struct list_head *list,
> const struct list_head *head)
> {
> return list->next == head;
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline int list_is_last(const struct list_head *list,
> * list_empty - tests whether a list is empty
> * @head: the list to test.
> */
> -static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
> +static inline bool list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
> {
> return head->next == head;
> }
> @@ -195,7 +195,7 @@ static inline int list_empty(const struct list_head *head)
> * to the list entry is list_del_init(). Eg. it cannot be used
> * if another CPU could re-list_add() it.
> */
> -static inline int list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
> +static inline bool list_empty_careful(const struct list_head *head)
> {
> struct list_head *next = head->next;
> return (next == head) && (next == head->prev);
> @@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static inline void list_rotate_left(struct list_head *head)
> * list_is_singular - tests whether a list has just one entry.
> * @head: the list to test.
> */
> -static inline int list_is_singular(const struct list_head *head)
> +static inline bool list_is_singular(const struct list_head *head)
> {
> return !list_empty(head) && (head->next == head->prev);
> }
---
~Randy
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-23 19:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-21 13:35 Robert P. J. Day
2010-11-22 4:59 ` Rakib Mullick
2010-11-23 19:16 ` Randy Dunlap [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101123111658.8bfb91cd.randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--to=randy.dunlap@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome