From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754011Ab0K0C0v (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:26:51 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:36554 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753587Ab0K0C0t (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 21:26:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 18:27:14 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20101126.182714.226785459.davem@davemloft.net> To: mhocko@suse.cz Cc: stable@kernel.org, vegard.nossum@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, eugene@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] af_unix: limit unix_tot_inflight From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20101126085000.GA4532@tiehlicka.suse.cz> References: <1290553918.2866.80.camel@edumazet-laptop> <1290590335.3464.24.camel@edumazet-laptop> <20101126085000.GA4532@tiehlicka.suse.cz> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Michal Hocko Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:50:00 +0100 > Shouldn't this go to stable? > AFAICS 2.6.32 contains the same code (the patch applies). > I haven't tried to reproduce the issue yet. I'll submit it to all the stable branches after this patch (and the other AF_UNIX fixes recently proposed) have sat in Linus's tree for at least half a week or so.