From: Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Frede_Feuerstein@gmx.net, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
603229@bugs.debian.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Scheduler grouping failure; division by zero in select_task_rq_fair
Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 16:26:05 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101129162605.GH8695@decadent.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291031425.32004.16.camel@laptop>
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:50:25PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 20:14 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>
> > [ 0.856002] Pid: 2, comm: kthreadd Not tainted 2.6.32-5-amd64 #1 W1100z/2100z
>
> What's in that kernel? is that simply the latest .32-stable?
No, we have quite a few backported driver features and some bug fixes
that aren't in stable yet. No scheduler or topology changes except
reverting 669c55e9f99b90e46eaa0f98a67ec53d46dc969a for ABI reasons
(which I guess we don't actually need to do).
> > [ 0.536554] CPU0 attaching sched-domain:
> > [ 0.540004] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> > [ 0.548002] groups: 0 1
> > [ 0.560003] domain 1: span 0-3 level NODE
> > [ 0.568002] groups:
> > [ 0.574179] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > [ 0.576002]
> > [ 0.580002] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > [ 0.584004] CPU1 attaching sched-domain:
> > [ 0.588007] domain 0: span 0-1 level MC
> > [ 0.596002] groups: 1 0 (cpu_power = 1023)
> > [ 0.612002] ERROR: parent span is not a superset of domain->span
> > [ 0.616003] domain 1: span 1-3 level CPU
> > [ 0.624002] groups: 1 (cpu_power = 2048) 2-3 (cpu_power = 2048)
> > [ 0.644003] domain 2: span 0-3 level NODE
> > [ 0.652004] groups: 1-3 (cpu_power = 4096)
> > [ 0.668002] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > [ 0.672002]
> > [ 0.676002] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > [ 0.680004] CPU2 attaching sched-domain:
> > [ 0.684003] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> > [ 0.692003] groups: 2 3
> > [ 0.704003] domain 1: span 1-3 level CPU
> > [ 0.712003] groups: 2-3 (cpu_power = 2048) 1 (cpu_power = 2048)
> > [ 0.736003] domain 2: span 0-3 level NODE
> > [ 0.744003] groups: 1-3 (cpu_power = 4096)
> > [ 0.760003] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > [ 0.764003]
> > [ 0.768003] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
> > [ 0.772004] CPU3 attaching sched-domain:
> > [ 0.776003] domain 0: span 2-3 level MC
> > [ 0.784003] groups: 3 2
> > [ 0.794183] domain 1: span 1-3 level CPU
> > [ 0.800003] groups: 2-3 (cpu_power = 2048) 1 (cpu_power = 2048)
> > [ 0.822183] domain 2: span 0-3 level NODE
> > [ 0.828003] groups: 1-3 (cpu_power = 4096)
> > [ 0.842180] ERROR: domain->cpu_power not set
> > [ 0.844003]
> > [ 0.848003] ERROR: groups don't span domain->span
>
> Hrm that smells like the architecture topology setup is wrecked, looks
> like the NUMA setup is bonkers.
[...]
Right, that's what I thought. Question is whether the topology setup
code should fix this up or whether the schedular init should (as it
appears to have done before 2.6.32).
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking.
- Albert Camus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-29 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1290449310.3868.13.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <1290470134.6770.929.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <1290514638.3892.16.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <1290900814.3292.84.camel@localhost>
[not found] ` <1290920436.4255.1025.camel@localhost>
2010-11-28 20:14 ` Ben Hutchings
2010-11-29 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 13:58 ` Frede Feuerstein
2010-11-29 16:26 ` Ben Hutchings [this message]
2010-11-29 18:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-14 10:07 ` Frede Feuerstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101129162605.GH8695@decadent.org.uk \
--to=ben@decadent.org.uk \
--cc=603229@bugs.debian.org \
--cc=Frede_Feuerstein@gmx.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome