mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
To: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session task groups
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:13:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101130141320.GA22588@elte.hu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1291123083.28239.18.camel@marge.simson.net>


* Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 2010-11-29 at 20:23 -0800, Paul Turner wrote:
> 
> > I've left some machines running tip + fix above + autogroup to see if
> > anything else emerges.  Hasn't crashed yet, I'll leave it going
> > overnight.
> 
> Thanks.  Below is the hopefully final version against tip.  The last I
> sent contained a couple remnants.

Note, I removed this chunk:

>  kernel/sched_debug.c                |   29 ++--

> Index: linux-2.6/kernel/sched_debug.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/kernel/sched_debug.c
> +++ linux-2.6/kernel/sched_debug.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,20 @@ static void print_cfs_group_stats(struct
>  }
>  #endif
>  
> +#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && \
> +	(defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) || defined(CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED))
> +static void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *buf, int buflen)
> +{
> +	/* may be NULL if the underlying cgroup isn't fully-created yet */
> +	if (!tg->css.cgroup) {
> +		if (!autogroup_path(tg, buf, buflen))
> +			buf[0] = '\0';
> +		return;
> +	}
> +	cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, buf, buflen);
> +}
> +#endif
> +
>  static void
>  print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
>  {
> @@ -115,7 +129,7 @@ print_task(struct seq_file *m, struct rq
>  		char path[64];
>  
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -		cgroup_path(task_group(p)->css.cgroup, path, sizeof(path));
> +		task_group_path(task_group(p), path, sizeof(path));
>  		rcu_read_unlock();
>  		SEQ_printf(m, " %s", path);
>  	}
> @@ -147,19 +161,6 @@ static void print_rq(struct seq_file *m,
>  	read_unlock_irqrestore(&tasklist_lock, flags);
>  }
>  
> -#if defined(CONFIG_CGROUP_SCHED) && \
> -	(defined(CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED) || defined(CONFIG_RT_GROUP_SCHED))
> -static void task_group_path(struct task_group *tg, char *buf, int buflen)
> -{
> -	/* may be NULL if the underlying cgroup isn't fully-created yet */
> -	if (!tg->css.cgroup) {
> -		buf[0] = '\0';
> -		return;
> -	}
> -	cgroup_path(tg->css.cgroup, buf, buflen);
> -}
> -#endif
> -
>  void print_cfs_rq(struct seq_file *m, int cpu, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
>  {
>  	s64 MIN_vruntime = -1, min_vruntime, max_vruntime = -1,

Because it didn't build (for obvious reasons - the CONFIG conditions dont match up), 
but more importantly it's quite ugly. Some existing 'path' variables are 64 byte, 
some are 128 byte - so there's pre-existing damage - i removed it all.

Could we do this debugging code in a bit saner way please? (as a delta patch on top 
of the -tip that i'll push out in the next hour or so.)

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2010-11-30 14:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-21 13:37 Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 13:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-21 15:44   ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-21 16:35     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 16:15 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-21 18:43 ` Gene Heskett
2010-11-25 16:00 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 14:24   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-28 19:31     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-28 20:18       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 11:53         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 12:30           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 13:45             ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 13:47               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 14:04                 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 16:27           ` Linus Torvalds
2010-11-29 16:44             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 17:37             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-29 18:03               ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-29 19:06               ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29 19:20                 ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30  3:39                   ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30  4:14                     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30  4:23                       ` Paul Turner
2010-11-30 13:18                         ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 13:48                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 13:59                             ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:13                           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2010-11-30 16:41                             ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 15:17                           ` Vivek Goyal
2010-11-30 17:13                             ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 19:36                               ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01  5:01                                 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-01  6:09                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:36                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 22:12                                   ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2010-12-01  5:57                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 11:33                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-01 11:55                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01 14:55                                   ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-01 15:04                                     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30  7:54                   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-30 14:18                     ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 14:53                       ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 15:01                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-30 15:11                           ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-30 16:28                       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-29  5:45       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-01  3:39     ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01  3:39     ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01  6:16       ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03  5:11         ` Paul Turner
2010-12-03  6:48           ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-03  8:37             ` Paul Turner
2010-12-04 23:55           ` James Courtier-Dutton
2010-12-05  5:11             ` Paul Turner
2010-12-07 11:32               ` Paul Turner
2010-12-15 12:10                 ` Paul Turner
2010-12-01 11:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-15  1:13 [RFC/RFT PATCH v3] sched: automated per tty " Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15  8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-11-15 11:32   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 11:46     ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-15 12:57       ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-15 21:25         ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 13:04           ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 14:18             ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 15:03               ` Oleg Nesterov
2010-11-16 15:41                 ` Mike Galbraith
2010-11-16 17:28                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-11-20 19:35                     ` [PATCH v4] sched: automated per session " Mike Galbraith
2010-12-04 17:39                       ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 18:33                         ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 20:01                           ` Colin Walters
2010-12-04 22:39                             ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-04 23:43                               ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05  0:31                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05  7:47                                 ` Ray Lee
2010-12-05 19:22                                   ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 20:47                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2010-12-05 22:47                                       ` Colin Walters
2010-12-05 22:58                                         ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-05 23:05                                           ` Jesper Juhl
2010-12-07 18:51                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-12-05 10:18                                 ` Con Kolivas
2010-12-05 11:36                                   ` Mike Galbraith
2010-12-05 20:58                                   ` Ingo Molnar
2010-12-04 23:31                             ` david
2010-12-05 11:11                             ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-12-06  0:28                             ` Valdis.Kletnieks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20101130141320.GA22588@elte.hu \
    --to=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome