From: Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com>
To: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Maxim Uvarov <muvarov@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Neil Horman <nhorman@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: kdump broken on 2.6.37-rc4
Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 11:39:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101215103954.GA2243@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101214224135.GB19693@redhat.com>
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 05:41:36PM -0500, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:47:08AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > On 12/13/2010 10:20 AM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >
> > > it seems 32bit kdump need crashkernel much low than we expect...
> > >
> > > Maybe we have to find_in_range_low() to make 32bit kdump happy.
> > >
> >
> > Not this garbage again... sigh. Once again, I will want to know what
> > the actual constraint is... not just "oh, this seems to work on this one
> > system."
> >
> > I realize that the kdump interfaces are probably beyond saving -- we
> > have had this discussion enough times -- but I'm not happy about it and
> > I will really want to know what the heck the real issue is.
>
> Same here Yinghai. We need to debug that what is that upper limit for
> loading x86 32bit kernel and if we know/understand that, we can fail
> the loading of kdump kernel citing the appropriate reason. Last time
> our understanding was that as long as we allocate memory below 896MB
> things should be fine.
>
> Stanislaw, how much memory you are reserving at what address with -rc4
> kernel?
crashkernel=128M, system has 1G mem.
> Can you please look at /proc/iomem? And try to reserve same
> amount of memory at roughly same address at 2.6.36 kernel, and see if
> kdump works.
>
> So how I used to debug problems in kdump path.
>
> - Try earlyprintk for second kernel.
> - Try --debug, --console-serial options with kexec while loading second
> kernel. Important thing to know here is control reached to purgatory
> or not.
> - If that gives me nothing then it boils down to putting some outb()
> statements in first kernel and second kernel boot path to know where
> things went wrong.
>
> Because the issue was resolved by reserving memory in low memory
> area, it sounds like second kernel failed to boot early. So early
> printk might help otherwise outb() and serial console is the friend.
I could debug this problem, but I do not suffer from free time right
now :-) Would be better someone bootmem/kdump experienced debug this.
I just check other laptop (T500, 2.6.37-rc5, x86_64, RHEL6 user space,
crashkernel=256M, 1.6G mem), kdump does not work there too. So I do
think problem is hard to reproduce.
Stanislaw
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-15 10:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 68+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-03 11:16 Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-03 15:46 ` Maxim Uvarov
2010-12-03 17:11 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-03 17:54 ` Neil Horman
2010-12-07 10:50 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-07 19:24 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-08 14:19 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-09 7:16 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-09 12:41 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-09 20:09 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-13 10:08 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-13 18:20 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-13 19:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-14 22:41 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-15 10:39 ` Stanislaw Gruszka [this message]
2010-12-15 22:41 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-16 4:29 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-16 10:00 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-16 16:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-16 16:22 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-16 16:53 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-18 21:50 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-16 14:39 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-16 16:28 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-16 17:28 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-16 19:58 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-16 22:57 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-16 23:30 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-16 23:49 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 0:39 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 1:06 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 1:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 1:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 3:05 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 3:07 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 3:19 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86-32: Make sure we can map all of lowmem if we need to tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 14:33 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-16 22:01 ` kdump broken on 2.6.37-rc4 Vivek Goyal
2010-12-16 22:58 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 16:15 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 1:15 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 3:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 3:58 ` Yinghai
2010-12-17 4:08 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 4:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 5:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 17:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 17:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 18:02 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 18:21 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 18:35 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 19:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 19:46 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 19:50 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 19:52 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 20:01 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 20:06 ` Yinghai Lu
2010-12-17 20:34 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 23:51 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 19:56 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 20:11 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-17 20:59 ` H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 21:13 ` Vivek Goyal
2010-12-20 16:31 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2010-12-18 4:34 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, kexec: Limit the crashkernel address appropriately tip-bot for H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-17 19:50 ` kdump broken on 2.6.37-rc4 H. Peter Anvin
2010-12-13 10:25 ` Américo Wang
2010-12-05 14:35 ` Maciej Rutecki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101215103954.GA2243@redhat.com \
--to=sgruszka@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=muvarov@gmail.com \
--cc=nhorman@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome