From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751341Ab0LULXD (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:23:03 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f45.google.com ([209.85.214.45]:41913 "EHLO mail-bw0-f45.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750987Ab0LULXB (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:23:01 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=mpWZBeKYc9/0+f1eVCq+7rPkBGjHNp/56ia+i1N3fu9aMlLDRlUR8PGB/0LMpBJ+9g JFbxNvzOOLJvI+2DXrqM+0fX+vyLfMwYu4g0HpTf2MlQDNkg3l7g/MKb7xUBtiPRDCwZ zLz1X3mppiCXOQH87Crv9rfCAiHA0126Oi1lg= Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:22:54 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: "H. Peter Anvin" Cc: Christoph Lameter , lkml Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86: Use this_cpu_ops to optimize code Message-ID: <20101221112252.GB3515@htj.dyndns.org> References: <4D0CD337.4080407@kernel.org> <4D100400.7060104@zytor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D100400.7060104@zytor.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hello, On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 05:33:52PM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/18/2010 07:28 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > > Peter, these three patches are the x86 ones which were in > > percpu#for-next but should go through x86 tree. These should be > > applied on top of percpu#this_cpu_ops. > > Does that mean the latter is now a stable base that I can pull into -tip? Yes, #for-next may be rebased but both #this_cpu_ops and #for-2.6.38 are stable branches. Thank you. -- tejun