From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: Rabin Vincent <rabin@rab.in>,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org,
linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: platform/i2c busses: pm runtime and system sleep
Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 01:35:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201012220135.56766.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101221235127.GC10081@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
On Wednesday, December 22, 2010, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:13:53PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > Well, the _solution_ is to get rid of the legacy stuff from those buses in the
> > first place. Then, they'll just need to use the generic ops without any
> > trouble.
>
> > What you're proposing is a workaround that people will use as an excuse for
> > not doing the right thing forever.
>
> I hadn't actually realised that there was any urgency about removing the
> old APIs - I'd not really seen much work in that direction. If the
> intention is to actively push people over to dev_pm_ops that does make a
> bit more sense.
There's no urgency strictly speaking, but there's a preference. :-)
I think it probably is the time to actually start pushing people into that,
because the legacy stuff has been causing too much pain recently.
Thanks,
Rafael
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-22 0:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-16 18:26 Rabin Vincent
2010-12-17 0:09 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-17 15:25 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-02-18 2:48 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-02-18 15:05 ` Alan Stern
2011-02-18 18:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-18 19:25 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-02-18 20:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-02-18 20:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-18 22:16 ` Mark Brown
2011-02-19 7:24 ` Rabin Vincent
2011-02-19 9:54 ` Linus Walleij
2011-02-19 10:00 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2011-02-19 10:16 ` Linus Walleij
2010-12-17 12:54 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-17 13:25 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-17 13:34 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-17 13:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-17 14:24 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-17 23:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-18 1:04 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-18 12:54 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-18 13:20 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-18 14:59 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-20 15:00 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-20 21:13 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-12-21 23:51 ` Mark Brown
2010-12-22 0:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201012220135.56766.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=rabin@rab.in \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome