From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751809Ab0L2KxA (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:53:00 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f66.google.com ([209.85.214.66]:32776 "EHLO mail-bw0-f66.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751175Ab0L2Kw7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Dec 2010 05:52:59 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Ot0oR9cVdgxjk3UuAPopM2C5UBC50WUH/7ZCh6kiqgn0vWpb/wcrLLOYWWhwSiyER7 3MBBNqltyfWkfvUZSz6PUH5EjDDQT+N2gCI7FBfBxQpSeDiuVhk9rZq9WIedgZS+70Vp QCIqkHotZUU0I9mfjnOBlvFExRGJif3BtBHJY= Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:52:53 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: David Rientjes Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , tglx@linutronix.de, "H. Peter Anvin" , x86@kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com, yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, Pekka Enberg , shaohui.zheng@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/16] x86: Unify cpu/apicid <-> NUMA node mapping between 32 and 64bit Message-ID: <20101229105253.GK488@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1293536929-31683-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1293536929-31683-14-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:35:45PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote: > This is going to conflict with a387e95a ("") in x86/numa, so you'll need > the following hunk for acpi_fake_nodes(). I'm not sure why this patchset > is being based on x86/apic-cleanup rather than x86/numa? Because several patches from the patchset have already been committed into x86/apic-cleanup. Thomas, Peter, if this needs to be rebased somewhere, let me know. Thanks. -- tejun