From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753104Ab0LaLRV (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:17:21 -0500 Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:57059 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752075Ab0LaLRT (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Dec 2010 06:17:19 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=gErPsHj38UVIPG+uBx3i9iSECzzjM9R8TMsOZLepBSVXJfegfH4No52bgFOw2618dM i5yb/cAwWuVWkj4tL9ZLgxU4K03Z8Hm388NHF5BAf7U7QAfvOgIe8xbtYVtyXJtIM0R8 mnFee9VO2FNakhzlJqbBrl8ruyg1x1JiB9h3E= Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 12:17:12 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jack Steiner , Thomas Gleixner , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with the tip tree Message-ID: <20101231111712.GF18831@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20101231135546.73f318bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101231135546.73f318bc.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 01:55:46PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in > arch/x86/kernel/apic/x2apic_uv_x.c between commit > d8850ba425d9823d3184bd52f065899dac4689f9 ("x86, UV: Fix the effect of > extra bits in the hub nodeid register") from the tip tree and commit > 0a3aee0da4402aa19b66e458038533c896fb80c6 ("x86: Use this_cpu_ops to > optimize code") from the percpu tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. Thank you. Looks good to me. -- tejun