From: Yotam Medini <yotam.medini@gmail.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@alumnit.ca>
Subject: Re: APM_CONFIG on x86 - Is it possible?
Date: Fri, 31 Dec 2010 23:40:10 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20101231234010.0165f0e8@janini.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101231113954.dc9adbdf.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
The .config I ended up with does have:
CONFIG_APM=m
But no CONFIG_APM_POWER setting,
When booting the kernel, I don not have /proc/apm.
I do get:
$ sudo modprobe apm
FATAL: Error inserting apm
(/lib/modules/2.6.32.yumax/kernel/arch/x86/kernel/apm.ko): No such device
Please note that
drivers/power/Makefile:118
has:
obj-$(CONFIG_APM_POWER) += apm_power.o
Also the "/proc/apm" is created in
drivers/char/Makefile:71
obj-$(CONFIG_APM_EMULATION) += apm-emulation.o
drivers/char/apm-emulation.c:668-670
#ifdef CONFIG_PROC_FS
proc_create("apm", 0, NULL, &apm_proc_fops);
#endif
As far as I understand, CONFIG_APM is not sufficient
for the creation of "/proc/apm".
-- yotam
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:39:54 -0800
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 21:28:00 +0200 Yotam Medini wrote:
>
> > Randy,
> >
> > Thanks for your quick reply.
> > Sorry, but the subject line should have been:
> > APM_POWER on x86 - Is it possible?
>
> Nope, not on X86.
>
> > I do get
> > CONFIG_APM=m
> > in the .config, but I am trying to get
> > CONFIG_APM_POWER=m
> > as well. So far, I do not see how.
>
> APM_POWER depends on APM_EMULATION, which is not available on X86.
> But real APM is available on X86, so why would you need APM_EMULATION
> instead of APM_FOR_REAL ?
>
> Enabling APM (according to its Kconfig help text) provides /proc/apm
> battery status information.
>
On Fri, 31 Dec 2010 11:25:04 -0800
Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@alumnit.ca> wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 4:09 AM, Yotam Medini יותם מדיני
> <yotam.medini@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For a target ancient UMAX-ActionBook 530T, I am trying to compile
> > a Linux kernel that will support apm (/proc/apm)
> > for battery monitoring.
> > Alas, it looks like that with current 2.6.3n.* kernels
> > it is not possible to configure CONFIG_APM_POWER on x86(/i386)
> > architectures.
> >
> > Am I missing something, is there a bypass?
>
> CONFIG_APM still exists and can be enabled in 2.6.36 for me.
>
> Avery
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-31 21:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-31 17:38 Yotam Medini
2010-12-31 18:33 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-31 19:28 ` Yotam Medini
2010-12-31 19:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-12-31 21:40 ` Yotam Medini [this message]
2010-12-31 21:54 ` Avery Pennarun
2010-12-31 22:05 ` Yotam Medini
2010-12-31 22:10 ` Avery Pennarun
2011-01-01 16:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2010-12-31 22:23 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-01-02 19:16 ` CONFIG_APM_POWER - still possible? Yotam Medini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20101231234010.0165f0e8@janini.home \
--to=yotam.medini@gmail.com \
--cc=apenwarr@alumnit.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®