From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751456Ab1AEAkn (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:40:43 -0500 Received: from mail.openrapids.net ([64.15.138.104]:56673 "EHLO blackscsi.openrapids.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750957Ab1AEAkl (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:40:41 -0500 Date: Tue, 4 Jan 2011 19:40:38 -0500 From: Mathieu Desnoyers To: Frederic Weisbecker , Zhaolei Cc: "nhorman@tuxdriver.com" , LKML , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Subject: Re: [RFC patch 2/5] trace event skb fix unassigned field Message-ID: <20110105004038.GB9737@Krystal> References: <20110104235418.GD2911@nowhere> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110104235418.GD2911@nowhere> X-Editor: vi X-Info: http://www.efficios.com X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.26-2-686 (i686) X-Uptime: 19:37:33 up 42 days, 5:40, 5 users, load average: 0.07, 0.02, 0.00 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Frederic Weisbecker (fweisbec@gmail.com) wrote: > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:46:06PM -0500, nhorman@tuxdriver.com wrote: > > Acked- by: Neil Horman > > > > > > Sent from my Verizon Wireless Phone > > > > ----- Reply message ----- > > From: "Mathieu Desnoyers" > > Date: Tue, Jan 4, 2011 6:16 pm > > Subject: [RFC patch 2/5] trace event skb fix unassigned field > > To: "LKML" > > Cc: "Mathieu Desnoyers" , "Steven Rostedt" , "Frederic Weisbecker" , "Ingo Molnar" , "Neil Horman" , "Thomas Gleixner" > > > > > > The field "protocol" in event kfree_skb is left unassigned if skb is NULL, > > leaving its trace output as garbage. Assign the value to 0 when skb is NULL > > instead. > > Hm, if the skb is already null, we probably shouldn't send any trace. > > What about using TP_CONDITION() ? Hrm, let's see. It's been introduced by commit 5cb3d1d9d34ac04bcaa2034139345b2a5fea54c1 by Zhaolei. Event at the time of that commit, the only caller looked like: void kfree_skb(struct sk_buff *skb) { if (unlikely(!skb)) return; if (likely(atomic_read(&skb->users) == 1)) smp_rmb(); else if (likely(!atomic_dec_and_test(&skb->users))) return; trace_kfree_skb(skb, __builtin_return_address(0)); __kfree_skb(skb); } EXPORT_SYMBOL(kfree_skb); So it already checks for a null pointer before calling the tracepoint. This leads me to wonder why why this check was added in the first place ? Mathieu > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers > > CC: Steven Rostedt > > CC: Frederic Weisbecker > > CC: Ingo Molnar > > CC: Neil Horman > > CC: Thomas Gleixner > > --- > > include/trace/events/skb.h | 4 +--- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/events/skb.h > > =================================================================== > > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/trace/events/skb.h > > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/trace/events/skb.h > > @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@ TRACE_EVENT(kfree_skb, > > > > TP_fast_assign( > > __entry->skbaddr = skb; > > - if (skb) { > > - __entry->protocol = ntohs(skb->protocol); > > - } > > + __entry->protocol = skb ? ntohs(skb->protocol) : 0; > > __entry->location = location; > > ), > > > > > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com