From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751324Ab1AECjT (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:39:19 -0500 Received: from fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.36]:58241 "EHLO fgwmail6.fujitsu.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750875Ab1AECjR (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jan 2011 21:39:17 -0500 X-SecurityPolicyCheck-FJ: OK by FujitsuOutboundMailChecker v1.3.1 From: KOSAKI Motohiro To: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [RFC -v3 PATCH 2/3] sched: add yield_to function Cc: kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com, Rik van Riel , kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Srivatsa Vaddagiri , Peter Zijlstra , Mike Galbraith , Chris Wright In-Reply-To: <4D230C90.6060104@redhat.com> References: <20110104151345.3BC2.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <4D230C90.6060104@redhat.com> Message-Id: <20110105110837.B62A.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.50.07 [ja] Date: Wed, 5 Jan 2011 11:39:15 +0900 (JST) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 01/04/2011 08:14 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: > > Also, If pthread_cond_signal() call sys_yield_to imlicitly, we can > > avoid almost Nehalem (and other P2P cache arch) lock unfairness > > problem. (probaby creating pthread_condattr_setautoyield_np or similar > > knob is good one) > > Often, the thread calling pthread_cond_signal() wants to continue > executing, not yield. Then, it doesn't work. After calling pthread_cond_signal(), T1 which cond_signal caller and T2 which waked start to GIL grab race. But usually T1 is always win because lock variable is in T1's cpu cache. Why kernel and userland have so much different result? One of a reason is glibc doesn't have any ticket lock scheme. If you are interesting GIL mess and issue, please feel free to ask more.