From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752728Ab1AFOT5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:19:57 -0500 Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:40335 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751861Ab1AFOT4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Jan 2011 09:19:56 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 14:19:46 +0000 From: Russell King - ARM Linux To: Carmelo AMOROSO Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "nicolas.pitre@linaro.org" , "vapier@gentoo.org" , "nico@fluxnic.net" , "linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" , Filippo ARCIDIACONO , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] stackprotector: add stack smashing protector generic implementation Message-ID: <20110106141946.GE31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <1293111851-7175-1-git-send-email-filippo.arcidiacono@st.com> <4D245D16.5010702@st.com> <20110106093940.GA31708@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <4D25CEB9.7090205@st.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D25CEB9.7090205@st.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:16:25PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Well, SH (in CC) does not have this support. Indeed we posted it > initially to linux-sh only. We got useful feedback from Paul, Mike and > Nicolas suggesting to promote the ARM/SH solution based on the global > __stack_chk_guard variable as a generic solution for all other > architectures. This is why I thought to post to the LKML instead of each > linux- list. Have you thought about posting it to _the_ linux-arch list?