From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752789Ab1AFES0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:18:26 -0500 Received: from chilli.pcug.org.au ([203.10.76.44]:55462 "EHLO smtps.tip.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752221Ab1AFESZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Jan 2011 23:18:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:18:15 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Tejun Heo Cc: Rusty Russell , Christoph Lameter , Ingo Molnar , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the percpu tree Message-Id: <20110106151815.9e5c2a1e.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20110104051314.GA6748@mtj.dyndns.org> References: <20110104152105.5cc7c3a9.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> <20110104051314.GA6748@mtj.dyndns.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="PGP-SHA1"; boundary="Signature=_Thu__6_Jan_2011_15_18_15_+1100_=L4SgHQHIKYoFWP4" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Signature=_Thu__6_Jan_2011_15_18_15_+1100_=L4SgHQHIKYoFWP4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Tejun, On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 06:13:14 +0100 Tejun Heo wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 03:21:05PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > After merging the percpu tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > > allmodconfig) failed like this: > >=20 > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c: In function 'intel_thermal_in= terrupt': > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/therm_throt.c:368: error: implicit declarati= on of function 'this_cpu_has' > >=20 > > Caused by commit 6ac0bb7148b93fb40bccba5dff06d51a3e3ea283 ("x86: use > > this_cpu_has for thermal_interrupt"). > >=20 > > this_cpu_has() does not exist anywhere except in this introduced usage. > >=20 > > I have used the percpu tree from next-20101231 for today. >=20 > My apologies. I forgot an earlier patch to introduce this_cpu_has() > macro. I've reverted the offending commit. But that revert is not in your published for-next branch yet. I have manually reverted that commit for today. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr@canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ --Signature=_Thu__6_Jan_2011_15_18_15_+1100_=L4SgHQHIKYoFWP4 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNJUKHAAoJEDMEi1NhKgbsi0IIAJ4wl3B0O/gRcrms4rTXKT+v BRY2sjLFJ898QbFhYyKicaovioM3RWJu4aO9PtLUpAbFF1X7VFhmfQixl/TfIteP h14KryAoS/YgS9er5vWtKbMlMjwGpQ5pg53des5SwKVdzU1FpK1c9e1LUNBkP0AD kOCJqCe3pdSyxaqGvoV+G7GeAoLWKCPt9hZFYltDhJYRevITSRC7S78vLW3C6y2D gPeJgs2ZYnTuNmsfOEZk6vjrYRB70sLPjUWIidg8+34cZ1HljBqBB+e0o4i53K4O sjPhSixMHstgFiVfqzeXBIDob/DOKdSrbWFSKWqN281k+JxkFlbvVfbRGrBT6Ms= =EuyS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Thu__6_Jan_2011_15_18_15_+1100_=L4SgHQHIKYoFWP4--