From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754933Ab1AJV7s (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:59:48 -0500 Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org ([82.139.201.20]:57573 "EHLO wavehammer.waldi.eu.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754598Ab1AJV7p (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 16:59:45 -0500 Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:59:37 +0100 From: Bastian Blank To: "Serge E. Hallyn" Cc: containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, kernel list , LSM , "Eric W. Biederman" , Kees Cook , Alexey Dobriyan , Michael Kerrisk Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] user namespaces: convert all capable checks in kernel/sys.c Message-ID: <20110110215937.GB21351@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org> Mail-Followup-To: Bastian Blank , "Serge E. Hallyn" , containers@lists.linux-foundation.org, kernel list , LSM , "Eric W. Biederman" , Kees Cook , Alexey Dobriyan , Michael Kerrisk References: <20110110211135.GA22446@mail.hallyn.com> <20110110211406.GF22564@mail.hallyn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110110211406.GF22564@mail.hallyn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 09:14:07PM +0000, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: > - if (pcred->uid != cred->euid && > - pcred->euid != cred->euid && !capable(CAP_SYS_NICE)) { > + if (pcred->user->user_ns != cred->user->user_ns && > + pcred->uid != cred->euid && > + pcred->euid != cred->euid && > + !ns_capable(pcred->user->user_ns, CAP_SYS_NICE)) { I don't think this is correct. This would not error out if the both userns are the same. Because the same patern (check uid if same userns, otherwise only capability) shows up in several parts of the code, maybe this should be factored out. > @@ -496,7 +498,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(setregid, gid_t, rgid, gid_t, egid) > if (rgid != (gid_t) -1) { > if (old->gid == rgid || > old->egid == rgid || > - capable(CAP_SETGID)) > + ns_capable(current_user_ns(), CAP_SETGID)) Would it not possible to add another function (nsown_capable?) that checks against the own userns? Bastian -- Change is the essential process of all existence. -- Spock, "Let That Be Your Last Battlefield", stardate 5730.2