From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754243Ab1AKACr (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:02:47 -0500 Received: from ogre.sisk.pl ([217.79.144.158]:48219 "EHLO ogre.sisk.pl" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753903Ab1AKACp (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2011 19:02:45 -0500 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" To: Len Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpuidle: Make cpuidle_enable_device() call poll_idle_init() Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 01:02:22 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.37+; KDE/4.4.4; x86_64; ; ) Cc: LKML , ACPI Devel Maling List , "Linux-pm mailing list" , Andrew Morton , Thomas Renninger References: <201101080029.20744.rjw@sisk.pl> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201101110102.22204.rjw@sisk.pl> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, January 11, 2011, Len Brown wrote: > > /** > > * cpuidle_enable_device - enables idle PM for a CPU > > * @dev: the CPU > > @@ -176,6 +215,8 @@ int cpuidle_enable_device(struct cpuidle > > ret = __cpuidle_register_device(dev); > > if (ret) > > return ret; > > + } else { > > + poll_idle_init(dev); > > } > > how about calling poll_idle_init() unconditionally here > and deleting the call to it from within __cpuidle_register_device()? Fine by me, as long as poll_idle_init() is called before the conditional. :-) Thanks, Rafael