From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/5][RT] [GIT PULL] rt: Port of Lai Jiangshan's rt patch
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 22:53:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110111035355.643480133@goodmis.org> (raw)
Thomas,
I finally got Lai's patch to a point that I'm happy with it.
The first 4 patches are clean ups to help in applying Lai's patch
at the end.
I've tested this patch series by running dbench 100 in a loop
and it crashes as much as mainline 2.6.33 does ;-) so I'm pretty
happy with it.
The following patches are in:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-rt.git
branch: rt/tip/rt/devel
Lai Jiangshan (1):
rtmutex: Ensure only the top waiter or higher priority task can take the lock
Steven Rostedt (4):
rtmutex: Only save lock depth once in spin_slowlock
rtmutex: Try to take lock early in rt_spin_lock_slowlock()
rtmutex: Revert Optimize rt lock wakeup
rtmutex: Fix comment about why new_owner can be NULL in wake_futex_pi()
----
kernel/futex.c | 20 +-
kernel/rt.c | 10 +-
kernel/rtmutex-debug.c | 1 -
kernel/rtmutex.c | 478 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------------
kernel/rtmutex_common.h | 18 +--
5 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 323 deletions(-)
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-11 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-11 3:53 Steven Rostedt [this message]
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 1/5][RT] rtmutex: Only save lock depth once in spin_slowlock Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 2/5][RT] rtmutex: Try to take lock early in rt_spin_lock_slowlock() Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 3/5][RT] rtmutex: Revert Optimize rt lock wakeup Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:53 ` [PATCH 4/5][RT] rtmutex: Fix comment about why new_owner can be NULL in wake_futex_pi() Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 3:54 ` [PATCH 5/5][RT] rtmutex: Ensure only the top waiter or higher priority task can take the lock Steven Rostedt
2011-01-11 8:24 ` [PATCH 0/5][RT] [GIT PULL] rt: Port of Lai Jiangshan's rt patch Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110111035355.643480133@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®