From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932431Ab1AKQhz (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:37:55 -0500 Received: from mail-iw0-f174.google.com ([209.85.214.174]:62631 "EHLO mail-iw0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932399Ab1AKQhx (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Jan 2011 11:37:53 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=ElB00KtKzNfH/6ZYQ0h8U+IdH7DFde0P3CNRM2L6bEirQg0zo41czPrFYSx3UPj67X 5PjX886VDkm+wkDMGx0uTyoOSWpfEu/CODmE6WuDkBEdgGA02lUA9i4vFOXrXiCvMq/t 87yJm6anIMVz4NZjdjB/dDVzCHxqLGQfgKMvk= Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2011 08:37:42 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Jiri Kosina Cc: "James T. Dickson" , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: introduce 'notimeout' blacklist for Dell Vostro V13 (was Re: Synaptics touchpad on Dell Vostro V13) Message-ID: <20110111163741.GA8596@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <8583070.26.1294325869588.JavaMail.root@butch.jtdata.net> <20110107172847.GA28785@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 02:00:27PM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote: > On Fri, 7 Jan 2011, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > > Dmitry, what is your current plan with the notimeout thing for V13, > > > please? Still .38 material? > > > > Yeah, especially given that not all V13 seem to suffer from > > suspend/resume issue. > > Hi Dmitry, > > I can see that you applied the patch, thanks. > > It seems to be in 'next' branch -- does that mean that it will not go in > this merge window still? > Hi Jiri, It is in the next because I wanted to start staging 2nd pull before Linus pulled first one so I used 'next' for that. I will be merging next and for-linus tonight and it should be in 38-rc1 unless Linus surprises us. Thanks. -- Dmitry