From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756689Ab1ANK51 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:57:27 -0500 Received: from www.tglx.de ([62.245.132.106]:43467 "EHLO www.tglx.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570Ab1ANK5U (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jan 2011 05:57:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2011 11:57:09 +0100 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Grant Likely Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sodaville@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, dirk.brandewie@gmail.com, Andres Salomon Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/15] x86/e820: remove conditional early mapping in parse_e820_ext Message-ID: <20110114105709.GA7562@www.tglx.de> References: <1292600033-12271-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <1292600033-12271-2-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> <20101230083745.GC11721@angua.secretlab.ca> <20110104130839.GA21359@www.tglx.de> <20110114081446.GC21832@angua.secretlab.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110114081446.GC21832@angua.secretlab.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i X-Key-Id: 97C4700B X-Key-Fingerprint: 09E2 D1F3 9A3A FF13 C3D3 961C 0688 1C1E 97C4 700B Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Grant Likely | 2011-01-14 01:14:46 [-0700]: >Hey Sebastian, Hi Grant, thanks for doing this. >Can you please repost this series after the merge window closes? Some >of the patches have been reworked and reposted, but I've kind of lost >track of which ones need my attention. Also, some of the patches have Yes, this was my secret plan :) I also had to rework patches because of other patches either because they no longer applied or because the code had to change in order to work again. In case "[v2,13/15] x86/rtc: don't register rtc if we the DT blob" [0] goes into the category "lost track" and not "had no time to reply" could please take a look? The important part is where it could change behavior for OLPC and it migh end up without a RTC. I Cc Andres Salomon as might know where the RTC on OLPC is comming from. >gone in via the tip tree, so it would be useful to regroup and figure >out which ones are no longer needed. I try to regroup and a add TIP or OF prefix. >I'll be able to take a fresh look and pick up the ones that are ready >after the merge window closes. Okay. >Thanks, >g. [0] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/450681/ Sebastian