From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754757Ab1ATAkf (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:40:35 -0500 Received: from 74-93-104-97-Washington.hfc.comcastbusiness.net ([74.93.104.97]:34626 "EHLO sunset.davemloft.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754580Ab1ATAkd (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 19:40:33 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:41:07 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20110119.164107.135521108.davem@davemloft.net> To: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org, richm@oldelvet.org.uk, 609371@bugs.debian.org, ben@decadent.org.uk, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, mingo@redhat.com Subject: Re: Bug#609371: linux-image-2.6.37-trunk-sparc64: module scsi_mod: Unknown relocation: 36 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <20110119223339.GD23544@Krystal> References: <20110119221327.GA23544@Krystal> <20110119.142137.184823805.davem@davemloft.net> <20110119223339.GD23544@Krystal> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.3 on Emacs 23.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Mathieu Desnoyers Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 17:33:39 -0500 > So I guess we go for the following. Is it verbose enough ? It's got all of the details that seem to matter, thanks.