From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753599Ab1ASUTd (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:19:33 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:51349 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751820Ab1ASUTc (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:19:32 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:18:55 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Amerigo Wang Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , Arnd Bergmann , James Morris , Kees Cook , Namhyung Kim Subject: Re: [Patch] printk: move some loglevel setup functions to kernel/printk.c Message-Id: <20110119121855.c529f84f.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1295422165-22269-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> References: <1295422165-22269-1-git-send-email-amwang@redhat.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Cc: WANG Cong , Ingo Molnar (commit_signer:8/43=19%,commit_signer:4/26=15%), Andrew Morton (commit_signer:7/43=16%,commit_signer:9/26=35%), Peter Zijlstra (commit_signer:5/43=12%), Tejun Heo (commit_signer:4/43=9%), Arnd Bergmann (commit_signer:3/43=7%), James Morris (commit_signer:6/26=23%), Kees Cook (commit_signer:4/26=15%), Namhyung Kim (commit_signer:3/26=12%) Pease don't do that. On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:29:24 +0800 Amerigo Wang wrote: > These parameter setup functions should go to kernel/printk.c, That makes sense. > and should also be under CONFIG_PRINTK. Not so sure about that. console_loglevel pertains to the console system more than to printk. And the console layer is present even when CONFIG_PRINTK=n. Now, it may be that console_loglevel never does anything useful when CONFIG_PRINTK=n. In which case one wonders why the console code exists when CONFIG_PRINTK=n. Anyway. I didn't look at all this terribly hard. Please demonstrate to us that you did do so :)