From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753509Ab1AYNhG (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:37:06 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:44657 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752615Ab1AYNhF (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 08:37:05 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=m57m49FC7GY0rar5TheryP+95WLoL7G4hWQSwT/ibcuJxg1hvvwtBZzQjzNEVASGoC A1vH3EqUS9ycZ+nYDyaWP0lZUyCHV+R7+Cj5ZZl8MplavvA/7JNgPVsLdBX71EhraTNm ofz5miO2NONvrB8szzSbuQHyBc1uJhlgu4NFo= Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 14:36:56 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, Steven Whitehouse , Neil Brown Subject: Re: [PATCH wq#for-2.6.38] workqueue: use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead of WQ_RESCUER Message-ID: <20110125133656.GW27510@htj.dyndns.org> References: <20101231140109.GL18831@htj.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101231140109.GL18831@htj.dyndns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 03:01:09PM +0100, Tejun Heo wrote: > WQ_RESCUER is now an internal flag and should only be used in the > workqueue implementation proper. Use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead. > > This doesn't introduce any functional difference. > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo > Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com > Cc: Steven Whitehouse > Cc: Neil Brown Applied to wq#for-2.6.39 sans the redundant gfs2 part. Thanks. -- tejun