From: ppluzhnikov@google.com (Paul Pluzhnikov)
To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: ppluzhnikov@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [patch] UML kernels on {i386,x86_64} produce bad coredumps
Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:14:33 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110125231433.F2408190C3A@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com> (raw)
Greetings,
One of our users reported that when a user-level program SIGSEGVs under
UML kernel, the resulting core dump is not very usable.
I have reproduced that with the latest kernel:
make ARCH=um defconfig; make ARCH=um
Run the resulting kernel, then "inside" run this program:
#include <pthread.h>
void *fn(void *p)
{
abort();
}
int main()
{
pthread_t tid;
pthread_create(&tid, 0, fn, 0);
pthread_join(tid, 0);
return 0;
}
Analyze the coredump with GDB. Here is what you'll see:
sudo gdb -q -ex 'set solib-absolute-prefix ../root_fs' -ex 'file ../root_fs/var/tmp/mt-abort' -ex 'core ../root_fs/var/tmp/core.762'
Reading symbols from /usr/local/google/root_fs/var/tmp/mt-abort...done.
[New Thread 763]
[New Thread 762]
Core was generated by `./mt-abort'.
Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted.
#0 0x0000000040255250 in raise () from ../root_fs/lib64/libc.so.6
(gdb) info thread
2 Thread 762 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
* 1 Thread 763 0x0000000040255250 in raise () from ../root_fs/lib64/libc.so.6
Note that thread#2 looks funny.
(gdb) thread 2
[Switching to thread 2 (Thread 762)]#0 0x0000000000000000 in ?? ()
(gdb) info reg
rax 0x0 0
rbx 0x0 0
rcx 0x0 0
rdx 0x0 0
rsi 0x0 0
rdi 0x0 0
rbp 0x0 0x0
rsp 0x0 0x0
r8 0x0 0
r9 0x0 0
r10 0x0 0
r11 0x0 0
r12 0x0 0
r13 0x0 0
r14 0x0 0
r15 0x0 0
rip 0x0 0
eflags 0x0 [ ]
cs 0x0 0
ss 0x0 0
ds 0x0 0
es 0x0 0
fs 0x0 0
gs 0x0 0
Examining the core shows that NT_PRSTATUS notes for all threads other than
the one that crashed are zeroed out.
I believe this is happening because neither ELF_CORE_COPY_TASK_REGS nor
task_pt_regs are defined under ARCH=um, and so elf_core_copy_task_regs()
becomes a no-op.
Attached patch fixes this for SUBARCH={x86_64,i386}.
Thanks,
--
Paul Pluzhnikov
P.S. Google has blanket FSF copyright assignment.
Signed-off-by: Paul Pluzhnikov <ppluzhnikov@google.com>
diff --git a/arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h b/arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h
index a979a22..d964a41 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h
+++ b/arch/um/sys-i386/asm/elf.h
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ typedef struct user_i387_struct elf_fpregset_t;
pr_reg[16] = PT_REGS_SS(regs); \
} while (0);
+#define task_pt_regs(t) (&(t)->thread.regs)
+
struct task_struct;
extern int elf_core_copy_fpregs(struct task_struct *t, elf_fpregset_t *fpu);
diff --git a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h
index d760967f..d6d5af3 100644
--- a/arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h
+++ b/arch/um/sys-x86_64/asm/elf.h
@@ -95,6 +95,8 @@ typedef struct user_i387_struct elf_fpregset_t;
(pr_reg)[25] = 0; \
(pr_reg)[26] = 0;
+#define task_pt_regs(t) (&(t)->thread.regs)
+
struct task_struct;
extern int elf_core_copy_fpregs(struct task_struct *t, elf_fpregset_t *fpu);
next reply other threads:[~2011-01-25 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-25 23:14 Paul Pluzhnikov [this message]
2011-01-26 4:29 ` WANG Cong
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110125231433.F2408190C3A@elbrus2.mtv.corp.google.com \
--to=ppluzhnikov@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jdike@addtoit.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®