From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755281Ab1A1Qm4 (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:42:56 -0500 Received: from mail-px0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:37097 "EHLO mail-px0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754805Ab1A1Qmy (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Jan 2011 11:42:54 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=Zl7F6MIHDvfaa5omQP6NufBmblGYNJzm2+ccQziF80rjkrCWtoi4XuVHbr0ze7XrTR Win4H3CmOTbKXWlaZaNS6GoyQ89X6JCLUCQdAiKLp1B5Aiwtnp07VSDQ3WSIkaCfqhYf zV3IjWOgjQiFF72ju/QqsE49UPPTgjbOFgNYs= Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2011 08:42:44 -0800 From: Dmitry Torokhov To: Mark Lord Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Linus Torvalds , Linux Kernel , linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: 2.6.36/2.6.37: broken compatibility with userspace input-utils ? Message-ID: <20110128164244.GB6252@core.coreip.homeip.net> References: <20110125232914.GA20130@core.coreip.homeip.net> <20110126020003.GA23085@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D403855.4050706@teksavvy.com> <4D40C3D7.90608@teksavvy.com> <4D40C551.4020907@teksavvy.com> <20110127021227.GA29709@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D40E41D.2030003@teksavvy.com> <20110127163931.GA1825@core.coreip.homeip.net> <4D41B5A0.70704@teksavvy.com> <20110127195325.GB29910@core.coreip.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110127195325.GB29910@core.coreip.homeip.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:53:25AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 01:12:48PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > > On 11-01-27 11:39 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:18:53PM -0500, Mark Lord wrote: > > >> No, it does not seem to segfault when I unload/reload ir-kbd-i2c > > >> and then invoke it by hand with the same parameters. > > >> Quite possibly the environment is different when udev invokes it, > > >> and my strace attempt with udev killed the system, so no info there. > > >> > > > > > > Hmm, what about compiling with debug and getting a core then? > > > > Sure. debug is easy, -g, but you'll have to tell me how to get it > > do produce a core dump. > > > > See if adjusting /etc/security/limits.conf will enable it to dump core. > Otherwise you'll have to stick 'ulimit -c unlimited' somewhere... > Mark, Any luck with getting the core? I'd really like to resolve this issue. Thanks. -- Dmitry