From: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: Jind??ich Makovi??ka <makovick@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: khugepaged: gets stuck when writing to USB flash, 2.6.38-rc2
Date: Thu, 3 Feb 2011 13:24:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110203132407.GF11958@csn.ul.ie> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110201154947.GX16981@random.random>
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 04:49:47PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 08:28:00PM +0100, Jind??ich Makovi??ka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am encountering problems when continuously writing larger amounts of
> > data to a USB flash drive. My configuration is
> >
> > x86-64 kernel
> > USB stick with 10MB/s write, 30MB/s read speed,
> > HDD with ~60-80MB/s read/write
> > 8 GiB RAM
> >
> > When copying 4GB or more in one go from HDD to Flash, during the
> > copying, fork() and probably other syscalls involving VM start
> > blocking (I first observed the problem in Chrome, which refused to
> > display content in new tabs). When one lets the copying finish, the
> > system returns to a usable state.
> >
> > During the limbo, khugepaged is in D state (uninterruptible sleep).
>
> That means no hugepage could be allocated. Maybe memory compaction is
> doing an overwork because all pagecache is dirty and can't be
> migrated. This should solve it if it's memory compaction:
>
This is very likely. Compaction calls into migration which will wait on
dirty pages after a time. With a large number of dirty pages backed by a
slow drive such as a USB stick, it could be getting stalled there for a
long period of time.
Whether migration sleeps or not can be controlled by the sync parameter
passed into try_to_compact_memory which could be always forced to false
if GFP_NO_KSWAPD?
> echo never >/sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/defrag
>
> kswapd state would be interesting too. Can you sysrq+t?
>
> Probably we should decrease the aggressiveness of memory compaction in
> direct reclaim. I've another report that memory compaction for order <
> 3 allocations is increasing latency, it's not like your problem but it
> may be related. The congestion_wait in compaction.c also makes me
> uncomfortable, it should bail out and fail I think. Maybe we should
> add a bitflag to differentiate the callers that can gracefully handle
> failure (like THP or most skb jumbo frame allocations) and those like
> the kernel stack that will return -ENOMEM if allocation fails.
>
--
Mel Gorman
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-03 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-31 19:28 Jindřich Makovička
2011-02-01 15:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-01 21:24 ` Jindřich Makovička
2011-02-02 0:26 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-03 13:24 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2011-02-03 19:06 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-03 21:16 ` Jindřich Makovička
2011-02-04 15:48 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2011-02-13 10:47 ` Jindřich Makovička
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110203132407.GF11958@csn.ul.ie \
--to=mel@csn.ul.ie \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=makovick@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome