From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: dwmw2@infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, ddutile@redhat.com, chrisw@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] intel-iommu: Unlink domain from iommu
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 14:24:46 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110211212435.21983.24286.stgit@s20.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110211211314.21983.83660.stgit@s20.home>
When we remove a device, we unlink the iommu from the domain, but
we never do the reverse unlinking of the domain from the iommu.
This means that we never clear iommu->domain_ids, eventually leading
to resource exhaustion if we repeatedly bind and unbind a device
to a driver. Also free empty domains to avoid a resource leak.
Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
---
drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
index 4789f8e..8bc56c1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/intel-iommu.c
@@ -3260,8 +3260,11 @@ static int device_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
if (!domain)
return 0;
- if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER && !iommu_pass_through)
+ if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_UNBOUND_DRIVER && !iommu_pass_through) {
domain_remove_one_dev_info(domain, pdev);
+ if (list_empty(&domain->devices))
+ domain_exit(domain);
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -3411,6 +3414,11 @@ static void domain_remove_one_dev_info(struct dmar_domain *domain,
domain->iommu_count--;
domain_update_iommu_cap(domain);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&domain->iommu_lock, tmp_flags);
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->lock, tmp_flags);
+ clear_bit(domain->id, iommu->domain_ids);
+ iommu->domains[domain->id] = NULL;
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&iommu->lock, tmp_flags);
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&device_domain_lock, flags);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-11 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-11 21:24 [PATCH 0/2] intel-iommu: Fix domain_ids exhaustion Alex Williamson
2011-02-11 21:24 ` Alex Williamson [this message]
2011-02-11 21:24 ` [PATCH 2/2] intel-iommu: Fix get_domain_for_dev() error path Alex Williamson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110211212435.21983.24286.stgit@s20.home \
--to=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=ddutile@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®