From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755572Ab1BNO6U (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:58:20 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:37900 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753976Ab1BNO6S (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 09:58:18 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; b=u5wvwHhAZkLOHT3/6BXgb6bm1gQFftYdy172lChG3WxBWsGQSWGz5E2J9KuZjUSPHo zpeE6eHE/5NAQz58YWFtYty4E6CKN/M5f8a7655gSSN6RRb2+TnJ1vTaENzz+C4b3wlk /+akq76BlxEgp8nxYVJ3tzfWc7eyTRf5tK4Ho= Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:58:02 +0100 From: Tejun Heo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org, yinghai@kernel.org, brgerst@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com, shaohui.zheng@intel.com, rientjes@google.com, hpa@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH UPDATED 03/26] x86, NUMA: Drop @start/last_pfn from initmem_init() initmem_init() Message-ID: <20110214145802.GO18742@htj.dyndns.org> References: <1297530663-26234-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <1297530663-26234-4-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20110214135052.GJ18742@htj.dyndns.org> <20110214142011.GB27076@elte.hu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110214142011.GB27076@elte.hu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 03:20:11PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > You forgot to add: > > Reported-by: Yinghai Lu > > The kernel development process is review and testing limited and we have a clear > oversupply in development power. So we want to encourage review and testing feedback > as much as possible, so adding all the Reported-by / Tested-by tags is absolutely > vital to being able to do more development. git tree updated accordingly, but Reported-by? I use that to identify the person who found out the root problem the commit is addressing. Once review cycle is complete, Reviewed/Acked-by's will be added so I'm not sure adding Reported-by serves any purpose. Thanks. -- tejun