From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC,PATCH] kprobes - optimized kprobes might crash before setting kernel stack
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:54:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110215165443.GC3135@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5AA209.7070309@hitachi.com>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 12:55:53AM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> (2011/02/15 21:30), Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2011 at 06:41:58PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> >> (2011/02/15 0:12), Jiri Olsa wrote:
> >>> hi,
> >>>
> >>> you can crash the kernel using kprobe tracer via:
> >>>
> >>> echo "p system_call_after_swapgs" > ./kprobe_events
> >>> echo 1 > ./events/kprobes/enable
> >>
> >> Ah, thank you very much!
> >>
> >>> The reason is that at the system_call_after_swapgs label,
> >>> the kernel stack is not set up. If optimized kprobes are
> >>> enabled, the user space stack is being used in this case
> >>> (see optimized kprobe template) and this might result in a crash.
> >>
> >> Verified here, and also it didn't occur when turning optimization
> >> off by sysctl. So this is a bug of kprobe jump optimization, not
> >> kprobes itself.
> >>
> >>> Looks like there are several places like this over the entry_$(BIT)
> >>> code. First I thought it'd be ok to localize those places, but
> >>> I haven't found any reasonable/maintainable way to disable only those
> >>> places.
> >>
> >> Hmm, agreed.
> >>
> >>> So I switched off the whole entry code from optimizing, but this
> >>> also switch many safe places (attached patch - tested on x86_64).
> >>
> >> I'm OK for this solution. I think possible another solution is using
> >> interrupt stack in optprobe template too. Anyway in short term, this
> >> solution will be good.
> >
> > ok, I'll test on 32 bits and resend to Ingo
>
> Thanks!
> And also, with deeply thinking about this problem, it seems that
> your idea could be the best way to fix, because kprobes can not
> know where the kernel stack is ready without those text section.
>
>
> >>> Also not sure this crash falls in to the area of that once such
> >>> probe is used, user should know consequences..
> >>
> >> User can see that those probe is not optimized via sysfs.
> >
> > I cannot find this, where can I see this info?
>
> Ah, actually, that is under debugfs, which is usually mounted on
> /sys/kernel/debug. You can read "/sys/kernel/debug/kprobes/list"
> for getting a list of currently registered probes.
I see, thanks
jirka
>
> Thank you,
> --
> Masami HIRAMATSU
> 2nd Dept. Linux Technology Center
> Hitachi, Ltd., Systems Development Laboratory
> E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-15 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-14 15:12 Jiri Olsa
2011-02-15 9:41 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-15 12:30 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-02-15 15:55 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-15 16:54 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2011-02-15 17:05 ` [PATCH] kprobes - do not allow optimized kprobes in entry code Jiri Olsa
2011-02-16 3:36 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-17 15:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-17 15:20 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-02-18 16:26 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-02-19 14:14 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-20 12:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-21 11:54 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-02-21 14:25 ` [PATCH 0/2] x86: separating entry text section + kprobes fix Jiri Olsa
2011-02-21 14:25 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86: separating entry text section Jiri Olsa
2011-02-22 3:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-02-22 8:09 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-22 12:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-07 10:44 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-07 15:29 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-07 18:10 ` Jiri Olsa
2011-03-08 16:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-03-08 20:15 ` [tip:perf/core] x86: Separate out " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
2011-02-21 14:25 ` [PATCH 2/2] kprobes: disabling optimized kprobes for " Jiri Olsa
2011-02-22 3:22 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2011-03-08 20:16 ` [tip:perf/core] kprobes: Disabling " tip-bot for Jiri Olsa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110215165443.GC3135@jolsa.brq.redhat.com \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=masami.hiramatsu.pt@hitachi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®