From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch v2] block: revert block_dev read-only check
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:11:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216181153.5b8f81d5@katamari> (raw)
This reverts commit 75f1dc0d076d1c1168f2115f1941ea627d38bd5a
("block: check bdev_read_only() from blkdev_get()"). That commit added
stricter checking to make sure devices that were being used read-only
were actually opened in that mode.
It turns out that the change breaks a bunch of kernel code that opens
block devices. Affected systems include dm, md, and the loop device.
Because strict checking for read-only opens of block devices was not
done before this, the code that opens the devices was opening them
read-write even if they were being used read-only. Auditing all that
code will take time, and new userspace packages for dm, mdadm, etc.
will also be required.
Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1215,12 +1215,6 @@ int blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev
res = __blkdev_get(bdev, mode, 0);
- /* __blkdev_get() may alter read only status, check it afterwards */
- if (!res && (mode & FMODE_WRITE) && bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
- __blkdev_put(bdev, mode, 0);
- res = -EACCES;
- }
-
if (whole) {
/* finish claiming */
mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
@@ -1298,6 +1292,11 @@ struct block_device *blkdev_get_by_path(
if (err)
return ERR_PTR(err);
+ if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) && bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
+ blkdev_put(bdev, mode);
+ return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
+ }
+
return bdev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_get_by_path);
next reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 23:11 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2011-02-16 23:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 23:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17 0:23 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17 0:46 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110216181153.5b8f81d5@katamari \
--to=cebbert@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®