mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Subject: [Patch v2] block: revert block_dev read-only check
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 18:11:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216181153.5b8f81d5@katamari> (raw)

This reverts commit 75f1dc0d076d1c1168f2115f1941ea627d38bd5a
("block: check bdev_read_only() from blkdev_get()"). That commit added
stricter checking to make sure devices that were being used read-only
were actually opened in that mode.

It turns out that the change breaks a bunch of kernel code that opens
block devices. Affected systems include dm, md, and the loop device.
Because strict checking for read-only opens of block devices was not
done before this, the code that opens the devices was opening them
read-write even if they were being used read-only. Auditing all that
code will take time, and new userspace packages for dm, mdadm, etc.
will also be required.

Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>

--- a/fs/block_dev.c
+++ b/fs/block_dev.c
@@ -1215,12 +1215,6 @@ int blkdev_get(struct block_device *bdev
 
 	res = __blkdev_get(bdev, mode, 0);
 
-	/* __blkdev_get() may alter read only status, check it afterwards */
-	if (!res && (mode & FMODE_WRITE) && bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
-		__blkdev_put(bdev, mode, 0);
-		res = -EACCES;
-	}
-
 	if (whole) {
 		/* finish claiming */
 		mutex_lock(&bdev->bd_mutex);
@@ -1298,6 +1292,11 @@ struct block_device *blkdev_get_by_path(
 	if (err)
 		return ERR_PTR(err);
 
+	if ((mode & FMODE_WRITE) && bdev_read_only(bdev)) {
+		blkdev_put(bdev, mode);
+		return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
+	}
+
 	return bdev;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(blkdev_get_by_path);

             reply	other threads:[~2011-02-16 23:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-16 23:11 Chuck Ebbert [this message]
2011-02-16 23:28 ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-16 23:56   ` Linus Torvalds
2011-02-17  0:23     ` Tejun Heo
2011-02-17  0:46       ` Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110216181153.5b8f81d5@katamari \
    --to=cebbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mbroz@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®