From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: reenable DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 21:07:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216200734.GA25184@merkur.ravnborg.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1297876993-4146-1-git-send-email-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 06:23:13PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> For 2.6.38-rc4-git9 only 29 out of 133 defconfigs still produce section
> mismatches. These defconfigs produce 55 mismatches (weighted sum, so
> maybe less uniq mismatches).
>
> This is in my opinion enough to start scaring people about the remaining
> problems.
>
> Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
> ---
> lib/Kconfig.debug | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.debug b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> index 3967c23..1130dd4 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.debug
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.debug
> @@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ config HEADERS_CHECK
>
> config DEBUG_SECTION_MISMATCH
> bool "Enable full Section mismatch analysis"
> - depends on UNDEFINED || (BLACKFIN)
> + depends on ARM || BLACKFIN
> default y
> # This option is on purpose disabled for now.
> # It will be enabled when we are down to a reasonable number
If we are deciding to make this ARCH dependent then a blacklist is
much preferred.
I know that we have warnings lingering in the kernel for a long time.
But throwing these waring in the face of people for each build will
be eoung incentive to get most fixed.
Last I took a deeper look at this I had allyesconfig + allmodconfig
almost warning free on x86. But I recall that especially the HOTPLUG_CPU
stuff was tricky as they misuse the annotation.
We could try to enable it per default - and seem if people scream too much.
Sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 20:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-16 17:23 Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-16 17:29 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-16 20:07 ` Sam Ravnborg [this message]
2011-02-18 20:47 ` [PATCH] kbuild: reenable section mismatch analysis Uwe Kleine-König
2011-02-18 20:50 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-02-18 21:42 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-02-24 15:26 ` Michal Marek
2011-03-11 0:41 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-11 0:44 ` Randy Dunlap
2011-03-11 1:00 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-11 1:05 ` Andrew Morton
2011-03-11 1:34 ` Mike Frysinger
2011-03-11 5:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110216200734.GA25184@merkur.ravnborg.org \
--to=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®